Friendmonton
Active Member
Certainly is telling about the state of both cities unfortunately. We continue to think small, act small, invest small.
Doing 'your own thing' is absolutely fine, if it's fine.
I've always considered Calgary to be Albertan Toronto so it makes sense that they're focusing on their strengths when it comes to their urban fabric, which is a corporate downtown based on attracting that certain demographic.Exactly, so if we can get some better architectural and urban design for our mid-rise projects here (wink wink), and 6-8 storey buildings keep popping off in and around downtown, we might have something going here![]()
Ok, you just about made me spew my G&T in laughter! Albertan Montreal? Puh-leez. Albertan Winnipeg maybe, or perhaps Albertan Prince George, or Albertan Saskatoon.I've always considered Calgary to be Albertan Toronto so it makes sense that they're focusing on their strengths when it comes to their urban fabric, which is a corporate downtown based on attracting that certain demographic.
On the other hand, we're Albertan Montreal. We have the capability to have a vibrant downtown that matches and exceeds them, but it comes down to less corporate presence and culture but more towards other strengths that we have over Calgary, notably the large post-secondary population, much better future transit connectivity, and having a less hostile pedestrian/foot traffic environment to continue attracting development. Montreal's the city to follow for us as a model rather than constantly looking down to Calgary.
I mean it's not a wildly crazy comparison. Both cities had strong economic headwinds in the 1950s and 70's. Both were the economic centre of the province or their respective region until the rise of a different financial centre taking the spot with a corporate exodus for both cities. Both were languishing economically in the 1990s to early 2000s from either external factors (oil glut/separatism) or decisions made by the provincial government (Klein cuts or the referendum/language policies). Both had stagnating demographics in the 1990s as evidenced by the 1996 census. Both have municipal politics that consistently and constantly are butting heads with their respective provincial governments. Both have similar housing stock with a stronger emphasis on rentals for their housing stock. Both cities have weirdly better transit policies and zoning policies than their counterparts.Ok, you just about made me spew my G&T in laughter! Albertan Montreal? Puh-leez. Albertan Winnipeg maybe, or perhaps Albertan Prince George, or Albertan Saskatoon.
Agree - I remember when the downtown library was built and I couldn't believe the city admin would allow something like that to be built in such an important place. Edmonton will never be as wealthy as Calgary but it is still a wealthy mid-sized city in this country and is the capital of Alberta, and there should be a much better effort by city admin and developers to create appealing projects. I still can't believe the downtown library was allowed to be built - who approved it?It's impossible not to compare. That render is gorgeous. They really are on a hot streak down south and while I don't think they're arena will be any better than ours they certainly are kicking us around in the convention center & library segments which are two we should reasonably be able to compete with.
Edmonton is more of a Ottawa/Hamilton - heavily reliant on government and industry. Calgary is a business city that does a lot more to attract investment, IT investment etc. Calgary is a corporate town and has been much more focused on attracting HQ to their city than Edmonton and has been since Turner Valley oil discovery. Edmonton used its federal government connections to become provincial capital and then get the UofA - this strategy served Edmonton well and it was Alberta's primate city for many decades, but it was only a matter of time until the more private sector focused city became the province's primate city and this happened several decades ago. These days the gap continues to grow between the two cities. Or maybe a good comparison is New Orleans - a large petrochemical industry with refineries, a privileged public sector that has a lot of power, a more liberally minded outlook surrounded by conservatives (North Louisiana).I've always considered Calgary to be Albertan Toronto so it makes sense that they're focusing on their strengths when it comes to their urban fabric, which is a corporate downtown based on attracting that certain demographic.
On the other hand, we're Albertan Montreal. We have the capability to have a vibrant downtown that matches and exceeds them, but it comes down to less corporate presence and culture but more towards other strengths that we have over Calgary, notably the large post-secondary population, much better future transit connectivity, and having a less hostile pedestrian/foot traffic environment to continue attracting development. Montreal's the city to follow for us as a model rather than constantly looking down to Calgary.
Doesn't mean I don't want us to not build more high-rises.
Yeah the self loathing here and p**** envy of everything Calgary often seen here is not super constructive. We are different cities. Full stop. The announcements around the new arena are very similar to ours - who cares if they are taller. Ours were/are what the market needed and could bear. We have to stop trying to compare ourselves to that but instead drive what our market and circumstances need.Edmonton is more of a Ottawa/Hamilton - heavily reliant on government and industry. Calgary is a business city that does a lot more to attract investment, IT investment etc. Calgary is a corporate town and has been much more focused on attracting HQ to their city than Edmonton and has been since Turner Valley oil discovery. Edmonton used its federal government connections to become provincial capital and then get the UofA - this strategy served Edmonton well and it was Alberta's primate city for many decades, but it was only a matter of time until the more private sector focused city became the province's primate city and this happened several decades ago. These days the gap continues to grow between the two cities. Or maybe a good comparison is New Orleans - a large petrochemical industry with refineries, a privileged public sector that has a lot of power, a more liberally minded outlook surrounded by conservatives (North Louisiana).