kris
Senior Member
Yesterday
Last edited:
I had forgotten it wasn’t gonna undergo just a renovation like the renderings here show. Is the updated proposal to build another super tall condo?
That still isn't actually confirmed and there's a little bit of debate between everybody whether they actually are going to cover it I think looking at the rendering as opposed to the architectural that there is a cut out to show the top of the tuned last damper and that the facade raises to shield it like you see on prestigeI hope that they don't make the new one such that the TMD is sticking out at the top with this like they did with the tallest building.
I wouldn't mind it if they incorporated some setbacks not just a flat wallThe height increase should be contingent on reducing the podium height, there's absolutely no reason for the 3rd phase to have such a monstrously large podium.
Actually now that I mention it, how would one go about making this comment to the city about that in this case?
I would agree if it weren't the same developer and the building looked completely different like for example if prestige was taller it would look dumb but the building being proposed is very similar to the same glass and balcony style as sky Tower so they were almost look like siblingsNot a fan of this purposed change. A city's tallest building should stand out as much as possible; having nearby neighbors that are close in height would detract from its visual impact and diminish its symbolic prominence.
What is this anonymous indoor amenity space being added? Is it an observation deck, as was announced for SkyTower? If so, why not just say that?Not sure why, but @innsertnamehere 's link doesn't work for me, if anyone else is having issues, try this one:
![]()
Application Details
www.toronto.ca
From the Cover Letter:
View attachment 669699
View attachment 669701
This the northernmost tower:
View attachment 669702
@Paclo