This project has taken a turn for the worse. The rendering looks horrible. If I was an original buyer when Crestford was managing the project I would want my money back. How can Concord add 10 storeys without reducing the ceiling heights for every floor? 8 feets ceilings in only 500 to 650 sq...

Agreed 100%. If you are looking at the view of the Toronto skyline from the east and see the north to south elevation, The One will appear to be the tallest in the city. From that elevation, it is possible that First Canadian Place may also appear taller than Sky Tower.

At some point the city will have to accept the reality that going a bit beyond 300 metres is dictated by market demand. The initial rendering is very thin, and won't cast a very wide shadow compared to 80 Bloor.

I would have to agree. The skyline will look a bit like a table top. It would really stand out in the skyline if the roof height would be 275m to 300m. Maybe go for higher floor to ceiling height to offer something different to prospective tenants. But again, Wishful thinking.

Thanks for re-visiting this. FCP has had quite a few conflicting heights through the decades. I remember back in the 1980s/1990s it was quoted as being as 289.9 metres. At that time, most sources wouldn't reference if that was the height to the roof or the top of the mechanical penthouse box.

The design looks good. Just wondering is the quoted height of 299 metres to the roof or does it also include the box on top?

In all fairness, the design of YSL isn't very appealing. Just wish the design was of better quality. 981 feet vs 1000 feet, there is no noticeable height difference. For example, most people won't be able to tell weather Aura or Scoia Plaza is taller.

Bayer, I agree with you 100%. Makes me wonder how many properties are funneled through laundered money and tax evasion? There is no requirement for full disclosure of beneficial ownership hen purchasing real estate property. A lot of properties are purchased through trusts, foundations, where...

Or add a spire to the new plan so it looks less bulky.

Nice work on the rendering.

I couldn't agree more. The height reduction was to be expected, but still tall (will most likely top 300m with parapet). Just wish the design was similar to the last rendering, a tall, thin, sleek structure. The base of the latest iteration is too wide. I just wished the current design had a...

But will it be a supertall?

Honestly , I don't think 299m is the final height. As previously mentioned, 299m is to the mechanical penthouse. I would venture a guess that the final height may be in 302 to 309 metres, depending on the height of the parapet. Don't expect a 10+metre increase. I see what you mean that so...

About bloody time that mess at the top will get cleared.

I agree the current design isn't the greatest. Could have been better. A wide 300ish metre tower just looks out of place in this location and doesn't blend too well with the rest of the skyline. Speaking of the Chelsea Gardens twins; they too will be chopped down by 10% or so.