F

ferusian

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Messages
443
Reaction score
2,739
City:
Toronto
ferusian said:
New ZBA application submitted:

Project description:

Development Applications
Click to expand...

Smart Centres + architectsAlliance: 44 storeys (131.60 metres including MPH)

1613718556015.png


1613718476052.png


(Mods please move to a new thread if necessary)
 
Wishful thinking but the fat side would look fantastic if it's done is steel. I guess it will be something more mundane.
 
At first blush, looks a bit overbearing; and rather cold.

I don't like street/podium level

Also, can't remember what the Golden Mile Plan says on this, but if you want sun to reach the interior of the site, given that these are at the southern extreme, the massing or the height need to change.
 
From the Docs:

The siting of these 2 towers is in the south-west corner of the property, adjacent to the current gas station and in front of the Wal-Mart, which appears to remain operational during this phase.

1613738020394.png


1613738791352.png


From the Planning Rationale Report:

1613738845777.png

1613738876345.png


Looking at the hydrology report:

This site appears to have a lot of ground water, some of it fairly close to the surface (within 1M); there will be a need for long-term de-watering.
 
Cautiously optimistic about this one, presuming there will be no drastic changes to this proposal.
 
I like the checker board pattern, but just make it a warm colour because, you know, golden mile. Podium needs a complete rethink. But this whole thing will be probably get redesigned once or twice during the approvals process and in a few years we'll be looking back wistfully on this design.
 
This is just more of the same glass podium/cereal box iteration plaguing the city. The ideal scenario for the Golden Mile would be to invite the top Danish firms to come in and provide the masterplans for each of these chunky plots. And then to design the actual buildings and not have them be value-engineered to the bare bones of the original plans.

Imagine warm toned mid rises lining along Eglinton, with building heights gently ascending away from the arterial.to perhaps 30 stories-tops. But, obviously, that won't happen/can't happen due to various intractable reasons that specifically exist in Toronto.
 
I don't like it. I'd rather see mid rise development and "real" neighborhoods developed. I agree with you Irishmonk. This is a lazy proposal especially considering the huge amount of developable land on this site. No reason not to build mid rise here.
 
Well the argument ('reason', as you put it), is you fundamentally get more people in a high rise. Your liking or not liking the built form is another thing, but there certainly are 'reasons' for it and 'laziness' isn't one of them.
 
ProjectEnd said:
Well the argument ('reason', as you put it), is you fundamentally get more people in a high rise. Your liking or not liking the built form is another thing, but there certainly are 'reasons' for it and 'laziness' isn't one of them.
Click to expand...

People have seen the Christie's site and know what's possible with with a very dense (and often tall) built form.

This is an off-the-rack proposal that seems cold and doesn't give a sense of an appealing street scene at grade.

It's lazy not because it's tall or because it's dense or because no work was involved in the conception and drawings.

It's lazy because there was no creativity with an eye to making human-scaled, street-level scenes that people actually enjoy; and incorporating warmth through colour and materiality.
 
Last edited:
Couple of things: You're certainly not wrong in that the Christie's plan is better and fundamentally more ambitious. At the end of the day though, we've not seen what Pemberton will do to it. Only time will tell. Second, this is Smart Centres, so at the end of the day, I'm impressed that they even went with aA...

At the end of the day, @Irishmonk and @jozl we're specifically talking about built form and their desire for mid-rise over high-rise here. That's what my post was addressing.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top