Developer: Waterfront Toronto, CreateTO
  
Address: Villiers St, Toronto, Canada
Category: Residential (Affordable Rental, Market-Rate Rental), Commercial, Institutional, Public Space / Park
Status: Pre-ConstructionCompletion: TBD
Height: ? ft / ? mStoreys: ? storeys
Project Forum 286 posts
Real Estate Forum
Follow 4 followingUpload 19 photos
Official WebsiteReport Error


I have to say though, I need to get one of those crystal balls that commenters bring to this discussion that predict the very worst for this park...

...actually, scrap that! I want to buy one that only says the best of things that will befall it! <3

This seems a bit over stated. It is reasonable to base an expectation for one situation based on the repeated experience you observe in similar situations.
Based on my experience, too often we invest money to built public resources, but not consider the pool of funding to maintain those same assets over time (even though we know at the outset there will be ongoing maintenance costs). If we know those resources are put aside - then evaluate this piece in its current context, if one does not believe those funds are more likely than not - then evaluate what it will look like accordingly in 10 years.
 
This seems a bit over stated. It is reasonable to base an expectation for one situation based on the repeated experience you observe in similar situations.
Based on my experience, too often we invest money to built public resources, but not consider the pool of funding to maintain those same assets over time (even though we know at the outset there will be ongoing maintenance costs). If we know those resources are put aside - then evaluate this piece in its current context, if one does not believe those funds are more likely than not - then evaluate what it will look like accordingly in 10 years.

Setting aside any discussion of the merits of the crane........

I agree that the City often falls down on long term maintenance.

Some of that is a routine funding issue, some is managerial competence........some is not thinking through proper initial investments. (in the context of parks, that can be paving or obstructing desire lines, irrigation of flower beds and sports fields, protective, ornamental fences around flower beds, etc etc.)

On the subject of larger, artistic pieces, like the crane, or like a nice fountain might be thought of........ I strongly favour a Public Art Conservancy. Having staff who love art, and are expert in its maintence funded through an endowment.

If we put 1/2 of all the public art funds the City collects into such an account, we could be build a formidable war chest to care for such things properly over a decade or two, supplementing with existing funding models until the money accumulates sufficiently.

The other 1/2 of funds, I would like to see pooled for new public art investments.....the pooling is important, one reason we have so much lack luster public art is the relatively small budgets for same tied to one-off projects.

If we pooled funds at a neighbourhood or district level, we could execute projects with budgets of 2-10M instead of $200,000

I would also like to see the funds opened up to pay for enhanced architecture as art, with design competitions for things like parks washroom pavillions or dramatically enhanced tile in subway stations, making the investments more practical, while also adding beauty to the public realm.
 
Last edited:
The vast majority of people in and outside the city would not care about the crane being removed. In fact, they would not even notice it is gone. So it is a bit of a waste of taxpayers money to restore it and let it use a major piece of land when it could be used for something more useful like housing or more park space.
I'm glad heritage preservation and architectural matters are not decided by the 'vast majority' of people. Imagine how much history would be lost. It was architects who fought to preserve the Penn Station, while the general public couldn't care less.

And as others mentioned, people want to take photos in front of the crane against the skyline, already it creates photo opportunities that you wouldn't find anywhere else. I doubt these people care about architecture and wouldn't notice if it were gone, but they DO notice it when it's there.
 
I'm okay with that idea. A bronzed streetcar plunked anywhere in Toronto would be neat actually.
Omg can you imagine? I don’t care if those are the size of a picnic table, but can you imagine like these bronze streetcars looking like oversized monopoly pieces strewn about?

This is the stuff I’d do if I was a billionaire
 
Omg can you imagine? I don’t care if those are the size of a picnic table, but can you imagine like these bronze streetcars looking like oversized monopoly pieces strewn about?

This is the stuff I’d do if I was a billionaire

The reference was to an old photo in this article. Recreating that photo with a bronzed streetcar would certainly be striking!
 
As one of the crane-sceptics, I would genuinely absolutely love if something was hung off off the top of it, that seems like a unique idea that more broadly conveys the history of this region. The structure while absurdly big in my opinion, feels incomplete
 

Back
Top