In listening to the presentation to EDC, the proponents say this area and space along 102 Ave can be made to be "active" and "festive" and "bring the community together". Wow, some views of 102Ave have really changed suddenly.
When the idea to pedestrianize 102Ave was talked about, people opposed to it like
@IanO said: "this is simply not needed until we have far, far more businesses fronting it and considerably more people living, working and playing Downtown."
and
"If Ottawa cannot get Sparks Street going with its more favourable width, beautiful storefronts/buildings, small-scale retail and significant daytime density... how are we expected to create a space that people want to linger, that's 'sticky' and full of activity with 102 Ave?"
But this "really nice parking lot" along 102 Ave, as one of the EDC members appropriately called the proposal, is suddenly going to "bring the community together" now because of a couple of tactical, temporary elements like a piece of public art on one corner and a coffee shack in another?
This is a new surface parking lot as it proposed now - pure and simple. How can someone point out that we don't have the businesses, the nearby infrastructure, the foot traffic and enough people living and working downtown in one breath, and then think a parking lot with coffee or ice cream can bring the community together? I appreciate the desire to do so, but you don't really believe what you're proposing will do that, do you?
As an aside, here's the most recent Westrich surface parking lot during a weekday winter afternoon. I'm not saying there was a claim this lot would bring the community together, just sharing it.