Today
IMG_9665.jpeg
 
Just me or does it feel like they've really slowed down over the last few weeks?

Building F continues to move slower than construction on the crosstown, while building G is moving along at a Finch West LRT pace. I thought building B2 had essentially topped off but it looks like there's still more horizontal movement?
 
Looking at that floorpan, these look like investor oriented units. If that is the case, there may be a lot purchasers wishing this one was cancelled and their deposits returned in this market.
 
Toronto123@ said:
Yes, I want the deposits returned. I’m hoping they won’t deliver it under outside occupancy so I can get my money back. Even if I sell, I would lose hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Click to expand...
Sorry to hear that. I strongly doubt they will offer a refund if payments were made above today’s prices. They will likely rush to finish so they can secure those contracts. At the end of the day, it is a business and they are aiming for maximum return.
 
Toronto123@ said:
Yes, I want the deposits returned. I’m hoping they won’t deliver it under outside occupancy so I can get my money back. Even if I sell, I would lose hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Click to expand...
If it is that much of a loss you might want to threaten to walk from the deposit. I know they can come after you but you may be able to negotiate a bit better deal.
 
Civdis said:
I think the bright white cladding and dark windows will add a little texture to this area.
Click to expand...
With all due respect, I don't see it. A building using materials with actual texture, and color, would have brought texture (via variety) to this area. In my humble opinion, the utilitarian/dreary color scheme add nothing to an area already full of black, white, grey and pale blue glass buildings (One Yonge, Sugar Wharf, Pier 27, Quay House, and the existing AA proposal at 180 Queens Quay E), although I do realize that the last couple of Tridel buildings, Limberlost Place, and hopefully the Quayside buildings will offset some of that dullness as one moves east. The fact that the grey cladding/glazing look so cheap (I've seen it in person and it made a poor impression) only makes it worse. Hopefully the two towers on this site won't look as cheap (I expect them to look sterile, with virtualy no articulation, but I'm hoping that at least they don't look cheap).
 
FormerTorontonianBackInTO said:
With all due respect, I don't see it. A building using materials with actual texture, and color, would have brought texture (via variety) to this area. In my humble opinion, the utilitarian/dreary color scheme add nothing to an area already full of black, white, grey and pale blue glass buildings (One Yonge, Sugar Wharf, Pier 27, Quay House, and the existing AA proposal at 180 Queens Quay E), although I do realize that the last couple of Tridel buildings, Limberlost Place, and hopefully the Quayside buildings will offset some of that dullness as one moves east. The fact that the grey cladding/glazing look so cheap (I've seen it in person and it made a poor impression) only makes it worse. Hopefully the two towers on this site won't look as cheap (I expect them to look sterile, with virtualy no articulation, but I'm hoping that at least they don't look cheap).
Click to expand...
I guess we can agree to disagree then. My point is that this is a brighter white facade, unlike the buildings you mention.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top