slicecom
Active Member
The fencing is up!
It was designed as, and has always been, primarily a residential area.We need better retail, restaurants etc on that street as well, I find it's pretty dead for the most part.
We need better retail, restaurants etc on that street as well, I find it's pretty dead for the most part.
It was designed as, and has always been, primarily a residential area.
I was touring the area with the late George Baird and I made the same comment. I said, perhaps it’s not dense enough. His reply: “You have to remember, Alex, in those days ‘density’ was a dirty word.”
Yes there are two distinct parts of The Esplanade. The eastern section between Lower Jarvis and Parliament Square Park - the section with the Park on the south side - which has a few small retail and eating facilities (primarily aimed at locals) and the section between Lower Jarvis and Yonge which has a (once thriving?) much larger restaurant/bar and retail scene (primarily aimed at both locals and 'visitors') . When Time & Space was being built there were expectations that the retail at its south end would bring a bit more 'life' to the eastern section but to date we only have an (as yet unopened) golf place and an unrented space at corner of Lower Sherbourne which was designed for a cafe spreading into the POPS courtyard.I think Front Street serves as the retail 'high street' for the area, it's a mere 1 block away. The retail has a couple of patches on Front, but is mostly continuous from Scott to Berkley
The Esplanade also has a showy restaurant row west of Market, and, of course, the St Lawrence market on top of that.
I'm not sure how much more retail the area could support, or needs to.
I could see the virtue of adding a second, small, restaurant row, with patios facing the Esplanade/Park. But do we really need much more than that?
I also have to say, the density of St. Lawrence is generally quite pleasant, it's by no means empty, it's predominantly midrise, with a few hirise forms at the edge, and a smattering of townhomes.
No need to make it St.Jamestown.
I also have to say, the density of St. Lawrence is generally quite pleasant, it's by no means empty, it's predominantly midrise, with a few hirise forms at the edge, and a smattering of townhomes.
One can argue numbers all day (I won't), but that place feels dead almost all of the time, except for school recess.
It's an interesting lesson.
I won't extend this unduly either, except to say, I sincerely disagree w/the characterization of the area 'feeling dead'. I spend a fair bit of time in the area for a non-resident, and I've found it consistently busy. The parks are well patronized, lots of people out walking and biking. It’s not crowded; but I think that's fine.
In fact there are more like 300 townhouses, which occupy a significant area of the original plan, and there is also a lot of open space.
One can argue numbers all day (I won't), but that place feels dead almost all of the time, except for school recess.
It's an interesting lesson.
What's happening in that middle lot?
![]()
I looked it up on a map and it's bare. Is this privately owned?
View attachment 722453
The 'middle block" - Block 4 (baseball and dog area) and the first block (Block 1) Market Tent are the final phase of the park rehab. They are not yet designed and do not yet have funding. The Hydro work is underground and accessed from the Hydro One Station and is nothing to do with the park work.What's happening in that middle lot?
![]()
I looked it up on a map and it's bare. Is this privately owned?
View attachment 722453