News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 6.4K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 33K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 3.3K     0 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
23,266
Reaction score
59,092
In a squeaker......Saxe has edged Di Pasquale:

1666669738122.png
 
Last edited:

DSC

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
16,167
Reaction score
18,036
City:
Toronto
This may provide reasonable grounds to have the election voided and a by-election held.

Given the amount of people in that riding it is fair to say there are going to be alot of angry voters.

Judging by these numbers it is not a fair election.
The municipal elections are run according to Ontario law and, whether it is 'fair' or not, the law says that if a candidate dies BEFORE the election the vote continues without them if there is more than one other candidate.

Is the law fair? I am not sure but if it is to be changed that should not be retroactive.
 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
23,266
Reaction score
59,092
A couple of additional observations as I turn in for the night.

Council will now be ~25% visible minority. I believe the most diverse Council ever elected; though only about about 1/2 as diverse as the City as a whole.

Ideally the above, as with sex/gender counts is something we ought not to need to take note of, as Councillors should be elected on their merits; however, it is worth noting where Council's composition has been wildly out of line w/the broader community.

Council will be 40% female. Pretty sure that's also a high-water mark.
 
Last edited:

DopeyFish

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
209
Reaction score
300
we all knew tory was going to win... that's what happens when you follow rob ford, people will just vote for stability

but still happy about a lot of the rest. really surprised mark grimes was defeated. this ward is all over the map politically and it's been so, so long since we've had a progressive.
 

Jonny5

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
3,782
Reaction score
1,744
The municipal elections are run according to Ontario law and, whether it is 'fair' or not, the law says that if a candidate dies BEFORE the election the vote continues without them if there is more than one other candidate.

Is the law fair? I am not sure but if it is to be changed that should not be retroactive.
I would make one note of caution here: you are talking about one article in a long and complex Act which simply describes a procedure to follow for a particular circumstance. It does not preclude the possibility that some other part of the Act, or some other Act entirely, or even the Charter if you want to open a can of worms, could be invoked to legally challenge the validity of the election itself. I have no idea if this is possible, and if it is possible I don't know a challenge could succeed, but the point is this short clause describing a procedure does not all by itself have the legal heft to be an absolute ironclad guarantee this election would be legally valid.

EDIT: That being said, I consider a challenge here unlikely here mostly because of cost and time and also the value of the position is kind of low. On the other hand, if Doug has a buddy in the area who would want to run for the position, maybe he finds a part of the Act that legally allows the result to be nuked.
 
Last edited:

Richard White

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
5,685
Reaction score
3,994
City:
Toronto
The municipal elections are run according to Ontario law and, whether it is 'fair' or not, the law says that if a candidate dies BEFORE the election the vote continues without them if there is more than one other candidate.

Is the law fair? I am not sure but if it is to be changed that should not be retroactive.

Either way I can see this going to Superior Court. With such low vote totals for the remaining candidates there would be grounds for voiding the election.

A case can be made that the election is not representative of the wards residents given the circumstances.
 

adma

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
17,029
Reaction score
1,628
Re the matter of voided ballots in Scarborough North, one can roughly "infer" from the difference btw/mayoral and council tallies.

So, the total number of council votes was 10,403, a little over half of which went to Jamaal Myers.

The total number of mayoral votes 14,892. So if we subtract one from the other, that's 4,489, vs 5,315 for Jamaal Myers.

That's a very crude barometer--but it's also a reminder that only a fraction of the votes is cast in advance; plus, don't discount the likelihood that a lot of Lai voters (even those who shared her Chinese ancestry, and perhaps her right-of-centre politics) did default to Myers as the most viable e-day option remaining.

Elections are a funny thing.
 

DSC

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
16,167
Reaction score
18,036
City:
Toronto
Either way I can see this going to Superior Court. With such low vote totals for the remaining candidates there would be grounds for voiding the election.

A case can be made that the election is not representative of the wards residents given the circumstances.
I disagree, the law is quite clear. It may be 'unfair' though that is clearly a matter of opinion.
 

mjl08

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
2,041
@ShonTron: Will you be making poll result maps, similar to what you did in 2018?

The map of University-Rosedale will be interesting. I suspect Saxe won the more affluent areas of the ward, like Rosedale, Yorkdale and The Annex. I'm guessing Di Pasquale's stronger areas were Christie Pits, Harbord Village and Little Italy, where voter turnout was likely lower.
 

W. K. Lis

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
22,704
Reaction score
12,994
City:
Toronto
Either way I can see this going to Superior Court. With such low vote totals for the remaining candidates there would be grounds for voiding the election.

A case can be made that the election is not representative of the wards residents given the circumstances.
A vote for Lai would be same as "declining" to vote, "voiding" your vote, or "leaving it blank".
 

Bayer

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
1,668
Reaction score
1,570
City:
Toronto
@ShonTron: Will you be making poll result maps, similar to what you did in 2018?

The map of University-Rosedale will be interesting. I suspect Saxe won the more affluent areas of the ward, like Rosedale, Yorkdale and The Annex. I'm guessing Di Pasquale's stronger areas were Christie Pits, Harbord Village and Little Italy, where voter turnout was likely lower.
Happy for Saxe, the only candidate who knocked on my door (twice actually!). I see her as progressive but pragmatic. We shall see. Disappointed in Tory's huge majority and in the minuscule turnout.
 

Top