Urb
Active Member
That's what I'm nervous about. It's hard to tell by the angles of the renderings, but this feels like Metropolitan 2.0.
I think the Metropolitan gets a worse rep from the shadows because of it's context - for example, here's 15 Ave in-front of the much taller Montana building. 1 travel lane, two parking lanes, buffered sidewalks and a bike lane:Even if it is Metropolitan 2.0, there will be sun on the sidewalk since it's on the north side of the street. The biggest thing I dislike about the Met is the oppressive shadow it creates.
totally agree. something happen is better than nothingi like it better than that parking lot
I have no idea what this means (also I don't know anything about Moncton!)Ooof, it looks worse. I mean, it was never a good proposal, but this new thing is straight out of Moncton.
Yes they could have done a lot more to make the facade more appealing. Like you say though, the street level treatment is OK, so as long as we don't look up it'll be ok.Atleast throw in some floor to ceiling windows on the ends/front/back to break up that stock window garbage...but the street level and sidewalk is better than Met