trevorhayden
Active Member
Does anyone know the email to send feedback on the 107 Avenue shared use path?
|
|
|
Try bikesandscooters@edmonton.caDoes anyone know the email to send feedback on the 107 Avenue shared use path?
Does anyone know the email to send feedback on the 107 Avenue shared use path?
Speaking of: these markings popped up overnight on 104 ave (142-149 st). Silly104ave also hits numerous schools, then the columbian cafe/LRT station in glenora. So it's not the worst route. But I'm sure detailed analysis would disclose other challenges.
They are planning to connect SPR to 148st along 104ave as a neighbourhood route. then 148st will have a N/S route. So some of it is already in the works.
107ave is a great route still, just some real limitations/trade offs.
I don't know who needs to hear this, but the bike infrastructure in the 96 street renewal is actually nice.
View attachment 610492
I needed to hear thisI don't know who needs to hear this, but the bike infrastructure in the 96 street renewal is actually nice.
View attachment 610492
Toronto bros crying tears of sadness seeing this right nowI don't know who needs to hear this, but the bike infrastructure in the 96 street renewal is actually nice.
View attachment 610492
Let's not get too cocky, Danny might be taking notes...Toronto bros crying tears of sadness seeing this right now
Hence why all projects need to be concrete and built-in permanent stuff. MUPs in grass and permanent installs like 96 there. Not the hermitage temporary stuff. Too risky it’ll get removed.Let's not get too cocky, Danny might be taking notes...
Seems like a bunch of the "contraflow bike lane" routes could benefit from this treatment. This whole northeast of downtown stretch between 118 Ave and Jasper Ave has great bones for biking but has kind of been short-changed on the infrastructure front.I’ve been riding it every month to see the progress. It is actually really nice. I wish the city would standardize on something like this for directional bike lanes.
Especially since road improvement budgets have ended up hidden in bike lane costs in the past, like the time the downtown grid was purported to cost over $10 million but the vast majority of that cost was traffic lights that were going to be replaced anyways.The ability to relegate bike lanes to secondary streets in the grid patterned, central areas of Edmonton is going to be a good defense mechanism against opposition.
Standardizing secondary streets to support bike infrastructure upon renewal is a good path. The big spending announcement, like the $100 million, probably shouldn't be done again. Hiding the spending in road budgets should be done. The bike lanes are essentially just roadways and sidewalks anyhow.