EagleEye
Senior Member
With this decision coming tomorrow, if they decide to leave it at 47, will Ford then invoke the notwithstanding clause? Or is it over after the decision?
|
|
|
I'll drink my buck-a-beer, you toke your Trudeau weed.
This isn't new or unique to Toronto or even Ontario. Conservatives the world over are under attack and we're repeatedly browbeated for our political choices and made to feel ridiculed and belittled for daring not to be politically "correct" - whatever that means.
Isnt that what most people been saying here lol
The NWC is not supposed to be retroactive, which is how he used it. A bill isn’t supposed to be introduced twice, which he virtually did. Along with all of the other reasons, I am hopeful that tomorrow ‘s decision will not support this ramming through of a bill that was put together in haste and passed in haste.With this decision coming tomorrow, if they decide to leave it at 47, will Ford then invoke the notwithstanding clause? Or is it over after the decision?
After nearly 15 years of not winning seats in Toronto, the PC's seem to want that to happen again. Going after municipal governments across the province is a bad idea. When I was up in Innisfil this weekend, they had signs everywhere. How would those candidates feel if Doug decided that positions were being cut?
The NWC is not supposed to be retroactive, which is how he used it. A bill isn’t supposed to be introduced twice, which he virtually did. Along with all of the other reasons, I am hopeful that tomorrow ‘s decision will not support this rArming through of a bill that was put together in haste and passed in haste.
Laura Mae Lindo's dreads and Wayne Gates' mo'; what a perfect NDP-in-2018 backdrop.Mike CrawleyVerified account@CBCQueensPark
Premier Doug Ford twice claims NDP leader Andrea Horwath "wasn't here" last night for the debate. Here's a shot from the Legislature camera at 3 a.m.
View attachment 156862
the reasons I cited are written in the rules, however.and the NWC is not supposed to be used in a trivial manner but the issue is Section 33 does not have such rules set in stone attached to it.
The Ontario Liberals mostly got pushed aside due to bad governance and unlikeable leaders in charge, The Federal Liberals went into the wilderness for a bit due to bad leaders in elections, that is a key difference.
The issue is that the new leader of the Ontario Liberal cant really brings up the legacy of the great leaders like Dalton and Wynne who left power being very unpopular and I doubt they will be well admired. Like Dalton left office a while ago and no one gives a crap about him lol.
Trudeau while bringing in young voters, his last name really brought up his connections to rather well-liked past federal Liberal Leaders like Trudeau Sr and Chretien and that played really well (old Loyalties).
Also, Trudeau brought in a lot of Star Power to the liberals and I have a strong feeling the federal Liberals will find themselves out of office when he is gone in the future.
SO I have quite a lot of doubt that the Ontario Liberals can pull off a Trudeau.
LOL
A dozen wards?
I guess Toronto needs only 3 or 4 councilors then.
For smaller cities, a single Mayor should be able to handle the job on their own.
The NWC is not supposed to be retroactive, which is how he used it. A bill isn’t supposed to be introduced twice, which he virtually did. Along with all of the other reasons, I am hopeful that tomorrow ‘s decision will not support this ramming through of a bill that was put together in haste and passed in haste.
and the NWC is not supposed to be used in a trivial manner but the issue is Section 33 does not have such rules set in stone attached to it.
...
They are also not supposed to debate a matter that is before the court, but those are standing orders of the legislature and too easily changed. That assumes the Speaker will rule against them, which is not an assured thing...
The Speaker, Ted Arnott, is the Progressive Conservative MPP for Wellington-Halton Hills. Don't know how "independent" Ted is with Doug.