News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 10K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 42K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.1K     0 

I am not sure what's the point of linking to some garbage X account - other than for amplification purposes.

MoD

I posted a X link to a video of Trump meeting with Carney along with my comments about the meeting. Are X links not allowed? I don't know what is meant by "amplification purposes". Obviously, videos and pictures are embedded to enhance a posting. If you are able to reinstate my post, I would ask that you do that. Remember this website could not exist without people taking the time to contribute postings. I probably spent 15 minutes on that post only to have it deleted.
 
Rev. David Black, a Presbyterian minister from Chicago, stood peacefully outside an ICE facility with his arms outstretched, praying for mercy and repentance. Within seconds, federal agents opened fire on him.

Seven chemical-filled pellets were fired in rapid succession, hitting him in the head. They then reported laughed at him.

“I extended my arms, palms outstretched toward the ICE officers, in a traditional Christian posture of prayer and blessing,” Black said. “Without any warning, I was suddenly fired upon.”

This is how the Trump administration now treats public expressions of faith, by gassing pastors in prayer. And Rev. Black says it’s not an isolated act, but something “happening every day in Broadview.”

A pastor praying for peace was met with violence. Let that sink in.
Remember that when DHS is using far-right memes in its ICE recruitment, "certain types" are drawn.

Speaking of which, going back to this story


One thing that caught my eye was this bit

================
We received a response from an unnamed DHS spokesperson who said, “Loving hot, tasty, McDonald’s does not make you a Nazi.”
================

Because that "hot, tasty, McDonald's" bit reads rather...weird. More like ad-slogan talk. Like said spokesperson was disconnected from reality, or...an AI bot?

Maybe it's all come to this: that the federal agencies are resorting to AI spokespersons. And as with so much slop, it painfully shows, however much they seek to deny it...

(ETA: another possibility is that "hot, tasty, McDonald's" is itself a meme)
 
Last edited:
It’s not a problem with X but with the account you chose, as per @AlvinofDiaspar ’s message. As for this forum, it’s based on quality, not quantity.
...I presume the source material was of Alex Jones/Grok quality as opposed to one based on reality?
 
...I presume the source material was of Alex Jones/Grok quality as opposed to one based on reality?
Well, you presume wrong. It was a video clip of Trump ranting about trans-kids as he sat next to PM Carney (who has a trans-child) in the Oval Office. It was in a tweet with an innocuous caption describing Trumps rant.
 
Last edited:
Well, you presume wrong. It was a video clip of Trump ranting about trans-kids as he sat next to PM Carney in the Oval Office. It was in a tweet with an innocuous caption describing Trumps rant.
I know of the one. It showed up on one of my Bluesky feeds...but in the interest of this already being moderated, I'll let readers discover that one for themselves. >.<
 
They have no reason to invoke it. And them not getting their way is most certainly not a reason to invoke it....

...the only reason to invoke it now is for the removal on POTUS and his administration from office, as they are the source of all the unrest here. And demonstratively so. But I highly doubt they would invoke that on themselves even if would be the right thing to do here.

Also: It should also be enshrined in every law book around the world to never leave an open gun cabinet in a room full of spoiled, self-entitled 12 year olds.
 
...the only reason to invoke it now is for the removal on POTUS and his administration from office, as they are the source of all the unrest here. And demonstratively so. But I highly doubt they would invoke that on themselves even if would be the right thing to do here.
Seeing as the legislation unilaterally empowers the President, I doubt that would happen.

US Congresses have, over the decades, chose to solve problems by granting unilateral powers to the President, assuming, I assume, that they would be exercised reasonably.

1760014847298.png
 
This may be of interest to some?

In response to sweeping changes in U.S. science and health policy under the U.S. administration, the Health Science Information Consortium (HSIC) in collaboration with the University of Toronto Libraries and several Health librarians across Canada has launched a vital new resource: Beyond Borders: Impacts of US Administration decisions on Canadian Healthcare. This online guide is designed to help Canadian researchers, healthcare professionals, and the public monitor and understand the cross-border impacts of U.S. policy decisions on science funding, research collaboration, and public health.

The U.S. administration has enacted policies that have led to mass firings of scientists, significant cuts to research funding, censorship of health data, and withdrawal from international scientific collaborations. These actions have already begun to reverberate across Canada’s research institutions and healthcare systems.

The guide offers:

  • Tracking of U.S. policy changes with Canadian relevance
  • Uncovering censorship in research and implications to research efficacy
  • Information for health practitioners on how these changes may affect healthcare access and outcomes
  • Tools for researchers to navigate threats to scholarly publishing, funding shifts and data preservation
The site is an effort to promote scientific integrity and understand potential impacts to Canadian health outcomes. It also serves as a hub for collaboration, offering links to Canadian and international organizations working to protect evidence-based research and healthcare. We are hoping you will forward it to your networks as appropriate.

Visit the guide at:

Https://guides.hsict.library.utoronto.ca/beyondborders
 
I doubt that we will see a peace agreement come to pass. What has been agreed to so far is the release of all the hostages and a ceasefire as part of a "first phase". Trump is touting it as a "peace deal" because he wants to get the Nobel Peace Prize. I expect once all the hostages are freed Israel will go back to bombing Gaza and Trump will do nothing about it. The fact is since Trumps announcement yesterday Israel has continued to bomb Gaza killing 9 Palestinians. On October 3rd Trump ordered an end to the bombing of Gaza in a truth social post which Israel ignored. Israel has broken every ceasefire agreement it has entered into. It has a ceasefire agreement with Lebanon that it has violated hundreds of times since it was signed in November 2024 killing 83 civilians in over 300 airstrikes.

Even if a lasting peace deal is achieved Trump does not deserve credit since he enabled the carnage since getting sworn in to office in January in fact Trump has encouraged the barbarism by saying "Israel needs to finish the job". An arsonist doesn't get credit for helping to put out a fire they started. This is how I see Trump and of course Biden was every bit as culpable as Trump. They both belong in the Hague along with Netanyahu and senior Israeli officials facing trial for war crimes.
 
Last edited:

N.Y. Attorney General Letitia James indicted on fraud charge in latest case against Trump foe​

James faces one count of bank fraud and one count of making a false statement to a lending institution​

New York Attorney General Letitia James, a longtime foe of U.S. President Donald Trump, was indicted on Thursday on criminal charges including bank fraud, the U.S. Justice Department said, as the administration seeks to use government power against those who have pursued investigations into him or publicly resisted his agenda.

Lindsey Halligan, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, said James had been indicted on one count of bank fraud and one count of making a false statement to a lending institution. The Justice Department has been probing mortgage fraud allegations against her.

"The charges as alleged in this case represent intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public's trust," Halligan said.


Each count is punishable by up to 30 years in prison, but should James be convicted, any sentence would be determined by a judge.

In a lengthy statement, James decried the indictment as "nothing more than a continuation of the president's desperate weaponization of our justice system."

"These charges are baseless, and the president's own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost. The president's actions are a grave violation of our Constitutional order and have drawn sharp criticism from members of both parties," she added.

New York state Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, said in a post on X, "What we're seeing today is nothing less than the weaponization of the Justice Department to punish those who hold the powerful accountable."

Case follows Comey indictment​

The indictment of James comes after a grand jury in Virginia on Sept. 25 indicted former FBI director James Comey on charges of making false statements and obstructing a congressional investigation. Comey pleaded not guilty on Wednesday.

Trump has regularly assailed Comey's handling of the FBI investigation that detailed contacts between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign.


Former FBI director James Comey speaks during the Canada 2020 Conference in Ottawa on June 5, 2018. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)
Both indictments come after Trump, in a Sept. 20 social media post addressed to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, said James, Comey and U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff were "guilty as hell."

The indictments against James and Comey were both brought by Halligan, who was installed last month as the top federal prosecutor in Alexandria, Va. Her predecessor, Erik Siebert, resigned on Sept. 19, hours after Trump told reporters, "I want him out."

Siebert believed the evidence against Comey and James was weak, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters at the time.


In her statement Thursday, James called the decision to fire Siebert and replace him with a prosecutor who is "blindly loyal" to the president as "antithetical to the bedrock principles of our country," and she said she stood by her investigation of Trump and his company as having been "based on the facts and evidence — not politics."

As with the Comey case, Halligan presented the evidence against James to the grand jury by herself, without support from career prosecutors in the office, a person familiar with the matter said. Prosecutors in the office have previously expressed concerns about the strength of the evidence against her, Reuters previously reported.

Comey's lawyers are expected to argue Halligan was unlawfully appointed as U.S. attorney. If that motion is successful, it could complicate the cases against Comey and James down the road.

James is one of several Democratic state attorneys general who have sued to block Trump administration actions. She is best known for bringing a civil fraud case against Trump and his family real estate company in 2022. The case resulted in a $454.2 million US penalty against Trump after a judge found he fraudulently overstated his net worth to dupe lenders.

A New York state appeals court in August threw out the penalty, which had grown to more than $500 million with interest, but upheld the trial judge's finding that Trump was liable for fraud.

Both Trump and James's office are appealing to the state's highest court.

Trump denied wrongdoing and accused James's office of bringing the case against him for political reasons.

The Justice Department's mortgage fraud probe into James was opened after Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte, a Trump appointee, sent a letter to the U.S. Justice Department alleging James "falsified records" to obtain favourable loans on homes she purchased in Virginia and Brooklyn, N.Y.

In his referral letter, Pulte wrote that James indicated in a mortgage application that a Virginia property she was buying in 2023 would be her primary residence, even though she lived in New York.


A day after the indictment of former FBI director James Comey, U.S. President Donald Trump suggested his other perceived foes could be next. Democrats were quick to sound the alarm in response, calling it a 'dark day for America.'

James's lawyer Abbe Lowell has said that she mistakenly stated that the property would be a primary residence. He said she made it clear in other documents that it would not be her primary residence, and that her broker understood that.


The Justice Department, after receiving referrals from Pulte, has also opened mortgage fraud probes into Schiff, a Democrat who led the House of Representatives' inquiry that led to Trump's impeachment in 2019, and Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors appointed by Democratic former president Joe Biden.

Neither Schiff nor Cook has been charged with a crime, and they both deny wrongdoing.

Loans for primary residences can carry lower rates than mortgages on investment properties or second homes, which banks consider riskier. It is unclear whether James's, Schiff's or Cook's lenders took their intended use of the homes into account in determining rates.
 

Back
Top