Oddball
Senior Member
P■■■L□□■A
U□■■I■■□R
B■□■C□■□T
That, in case you were not aware was my attempt at being artistic. It's probably highly derivative of something I've seen in the past that I can't quite put my finger on, but hey I'm trying. This is why I'm an analyst not an artist. You can probably argue that I don't deserve to call myself the former either, but then you'd have to know me and what I do better and then well...
This little aside is probably doing nothing to drive your interest in the thread.
Indeed.
I'm not trying to push some grand thesis here. Hopefully you won't TLDR me. The point about being an analyst is to say, if an uninformed schnook like me can't have an opinion about public art, then public art is probably failing at it's purpose. In Calgary we have a complex relationship with our public art. So I figured it was about time we had a thread to discuss it. This is meant to be a thread where we can all show off what we like and/or deride what we hate . Not just style either. This is a good place to discuss policy too.
(I also figured it was about time we had a little more action in the design & architecture sub-forum).
I'm thinking of the broadest possible definition of public art. Any art that's on display publicly. Not simply art that is owned by the public. Some of the most notable pieces in town are in fact privately owned. Maybe some of it really isn't even meant to be art? Whatever it is that you love or hate about our art, spill the beans.
U□■■I■■□R
B■□■C□■□T
That, in case you were not aware was my attempt at being artistic. It's probably highly derivative of something I've seen in the past that I can't quite put my finger on, but hey I'm trying. This is why I'm an analyst not an artist. You can probably argue that I don't deserve to call myself the former either, but then you'd have to know me and what I do better and then well...
This little aside is probably doing nothing to drive your interest in the thread.
Indeed.
I'm not trying to push some grand thesis here. Hopefully you won't TLDR me. The point about being an analyst is to say, if an uninformed schnook like me can't have an opinion about public art, then public art is probably failing at it's purpose. In Calgary we have a complex relationship with our public art. So I figured it was about time we had a thread to discuss it. This is meant to be a thread where we can all show off what we like and/or deride what we hate . Not just style either. This is a good place to discuss policy too.
(I also figured it was about time we had a little more action in the design & architecture sub-forum).
I'm thinking of the broadest possible definition of public art. Any art that's on display publicly. Not simply art that is owned by the public. Some of the most notable pieces in town are in fact privately owned. Maybe some of it really isn't even meant to be art? Whatever it is that you love or hate about our art, spill the beans.