News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.5K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.7K     0 

Kilgore Trout

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
75
Reaction score
4
So here's the second part. Did you see the first one? No? Well, better go check it out.

1
_01.JPG



2
_02.JPG



3
_03.JPG



4
_04.JPG



5
_05.JPG



6
_06.JPG



7
_07.JPG



8
_08.JPG



9
_09.JPG



10
_10.JPG



11
_11.JPG



12
_12.JPG



13
_13.JPG



14
_14.JPG



15
_15.JPG



16
_16.JPG



17
_17.JPG



18
_18.JPG



19
_19.JPG



20
_20.JPG



21
_21.JPG



22
_22.JPG



23
_23.JPG



24
_24.JPG



25
_25.JPG



26
_26.JPG



27
_27.JPG



28
_28.JPG



29
_29.JPG



30
_30.JPG



31
_31.JPG



32
_32.JPG



33
_33.JPG



34
_34.JPG



35
_35.JPG



36
_36.JPG



37
_37.JPG



38
_38.JPG



39
_39.JPG



40
_40.JPG



41
_41.JPG



42
_42.JPG



43
_43.JPG



44
_44.JPG



45
_45.JPG



46
_46.JPG



47
_47.JPG



48
_48.JPG



49
_49.JPG



50
_50.JPG



51
_51.JPG



52
_52.JPG



53
_53.JPG



54
_54.JPG



55
_55.JPG



56
_56.JPG




57
_57.JPG



58
_58.JPG



59
_59.JPG



60
_60.JPG



61
_61.JPG



62
_62.JPG



63
_63.JPG



64
_64.JPG



65
_65.JPG



66
_66.JPG



67
_67.JPG



68
_68.JPG



69
_69.JPG



70
_70.JPG



71
_71.JPG



72
_72.JPG



73
_73.JPG
 
Wow, Montreal's waterfront looks very nice. How did they manage to avoid throwing up large condos on the water's edge?
 
Different circumstances than Toronto, I guess. What you see pictured is the old port. Part of it is still a working port (the area behind that big grain silo) but, when the Lachine Canal closed in the 1970s, most of the activity shifted to th new port and the old city's waterfront became redundant. Most of the land is federally-owned so it was easy to redevelop it all at once. All of that green space you see between the railroad tracks and the water used to be the site of a few big silos.

There aren't any highrise condos near the water in Old Montreal because it's a protected district: you can't tear anything down and there are strict height limits. All of the new highrise condo construction has taken place on the fringes of the neighbourhood near Victoria Square.

To be honest I enjoy the old port but I'm not convinced that it was developed to its full potential. There's too much open space and not enough interaction with the water.
 
KGT: Nice Montreal pics again!! I will mention pic#31-there are AMTs former GO Transit equipment on the bridge in the background-was that near Windsor Station? #50 and #71 are nice rowhouse neighborhoods/blocks. Where exactly are these so I can pinpoint them on a MTL map? LI MIKE
 
Long Island Mike said:
I will mention pic#31-there are AMTs former GO Transit equipment on the bridge in the background-was that near Windsor Station?

That photo was taken at Notre Dame/Mountain looking east. Those are the CN tracks that feed into Central Station.

#50 and #71 are nice rowhouse neighborhoods/blocks. Where exactly are these so I can pinpoint them on a MTL map?

50 was taken on Park Avenue just north of Prince Arthur in the McGill Ghetto.

71 is the corner of Clark and Bagg, just off the Main.
 
KGT-Thanks for the info-The one thing I question(#31) is the former GO TRANSIT cars on the CN lines into Central Station-those former GO cars were built for low-level platform operation only-note the car side doors in the photo-Central Station has high-level platforms. Other than that,MTL looks good-just 375 Miles N of NYC! LI MIKE
 
KGT-Thanks for the info-The one thing I question(#31) is the former GO TRANSIT cars on the CN lines into Central Station-those former GO cars were built for low-level platform operation only-note the car side doors in the photo-Central Station has high-level platforms. Other than that,MTL looks good-just 375 Miles N of NYC! LI MIKE

I'm not sure how it works. I've never actually used any of the commuter trains. The other stations I've seen all have low-level platforms but I don't know about Central Station.
 

Back
Top