[Miscreant]

I know; it's a shame. The same building heights make the area look a bit too artificial.

 

[isaidso]

It does sort of look nouveau St. Jamestown in terms of the monotonous tower massing. At least this is infinitely better than M5V. I have to see that pile of garbage every day on the way to / from work.

This morning:

Not a single decent looking building in that entire shot. HOLY YUCK!

 

[innsertnamehere]

Really? CN Tower not quality enough for you?

 

[Midtown Urbanist]

I'm still LMAO at the cluster of buildings being the exact same height. How Toronto.

It's not overly unique. Washington D.C. is very similar. Although the context there is different for it here.

 

[maestro]

It's more common to see a cluster of same height buildings than a cluster of varying height buildings. Granted that trend reverses the higher up you go. The similar heights in the Entertainment District doesn't bother me. Is that each tower is maximum every square foot up to the height ceiling that bothers me. It's overbearing and, more importantly, doesn't leave much room for design.

 

[interchange42]

From the southwest, around dinnertime:

42

 

[isaidso]

Really? CN Tower not quality enough for you?

I figured someone might say that. CN Tower is supposedly a structure and not a building I've been told. I like the CN Tower.

 

[DarkSideDenizen]

Something needs to change in this area, and fast. Tableau and Picasso are a step in the right direction.

 

[junctionist]

Taken alone, all of those towers looked great on paper. But an entire district of minimalist grey towers of similar proportions is boring.

 

[friendlyfuture]

View looking at it head on. From today.

 

[G.L.17]

Sunday:

 

[alienhenny]

Like personallity i like it because it looks really good and modern and nice and chic and unique. It really ties everything together hunty.

 

[Edward Skira]

Sunday.

 

[Edward Skira]

 

[interchange42]

Done.

42