[ProjectEnd]

Colliers trying to get one of the Port Lands sites shifted:

Industrial For sale — Ontario | Canada | Colliers

Colliers International (“Colliers” or the “Advisor”) has been retained exclusively for the sale of 115 Saulter Street South (the “Property” or the “Site”), an extraordinary re-development opportunity

www.collierscanada.com

 

[AlbertC]

The suggested massing is just conceptual of course, but 6 and 10 storeys seems to be on the light side. Ultimately, the Portlands are a huge space to develop in the future and a mix of different types of format size and forms are welcomed, but I think the suggested potential scale needs to be expanded towards the 20 to 30+ storey range to make this an attractive initial entry into the district.

 

[ProjectEnd]

I don't have the maps, but I assume the height is because of the YTZ flight paths. I know Bousfields would not be recommending something so low if there wasn't a reason for it.

 

[innsertnamehere]

I don't have the maps, but I assume the height is because of the YTZ flight paths. I know Bousfields would not be recommending something so low if there wasn't a reason for it.

Billy Bishop has a 2% grade flight path like most aiports, and this one is over 4km from the runway, so the height limit here would be in the 80-90 metre range. Not crazy tall, but more than 10st.

The planning policy applicable in the Portlands is unbelievably complex, I believe the old Metro Toronto Official Plan still applies in some capacity from what I recall, so I won't bother to go look up what the designation is here, but the 10 storeys is likely coming out of planning regulations and not airport zoning.

 

[UrbanAffair]

This site was sold in May for 30 mill to Castlepoint Numa, by Colliers, as noted above, on behalf of a numbered company. It's designated RA. (Regeneration Areas.)

Source: Altus Data Studio

 

[Northern Light]

This is site a block west of McCleary Park along Saulter St. S for a two-tower (40s and 45s) development sitting atop a 7s podium. * note here that this proposal is pre-render

(above from the Planning Report)

Site as it is, per Streetview:

The Application:

Application Details

www.toronto.ca

From the Docs:

View from south-east:

Site Plan - note that 3 of the roads shown do not yet exist on this site:

Ground Floor Plan:

FSI: 12.61

Units: 1,300

Parking: 175 - Ratio 0.13

Elevators: 8 - 0.61 elevators per 100 units or 1 elevator per 162.5 units

Flagging @3Dementia and, of course, @Paclo

 

[3Dementia]

Nice to see Cobe's name on a Portlands residential proposal (east of the Villiers Island community plans!) and nice to see the tantalizing split truncated pyramid massings.

 

[rdaner]

Thank you!!! What caught my eye is the planned black box film studio in the centre of the podium.

 

[ferusian]

New ZBA application submitted:

Development Applications

Updated project description:

Proposed two connected bar buildings of five and six storeys are proposed, each containing a tower element of 53 and 47 storeys respectively. The proposed total residential gross floor area is 69,335 m2. Residential uses are located within the podiums and towers. The non-residential gross floor area is 6,123 m2, of which 1,489 m2 is for ground floor retail and 4,643 m2 is for PIC uses located on Level 2. This results in a total gross floor area of 75,781 m2 (12.85 FSI for the net site area).

Castlepoint Numa + COBE / SvN: 47 storeys (167 metres including MPH) and 53 storeys (185.25 metres including MPH)

Site plan:

Base building programming:

 

[Northern Light]

@ferusian with another... hey NL.... are you still napping post... LOL

The answer, yes, I was.......

***

Let's see if I can add anything useful though:

Bonus Renders:

Note to @Paclo and @3Dementia the above are close to full resolution (70-80% or original size). The one below is only 30% to get it to fit, it will be worth getting in it full size. Ferusian also has this one, I just added it to note how impressive the full size one is....but its large!

Consult the Renderings/Perspective file for the best images.

 

[UtakataNoAnnex]

Er...love that design, but don't the unit's real estate become smaller as they progress up at the slope side? Or is there a way that's all compensated for? Or does that even matter?

 

[interchange42]

Note to @Paclo and @3Dementia the above are close to full resolution (70-80% or original size). The one below is only 30% to get it to fit, it will be worth getting in it full size. Ferusian also has this one, I just added it to note how impressive the full size one is....but its large!

Consult the Renderings/Perspective file for the best images.

We extract original digital files for all database entries, we don't use screenshots, nor use unnecessarily large png files!

42

 

[artyboy123]

@Northern Light the architecture style here reminds me of "Schwartz Reisman Innovation campus on U of T campus"

 

[Northern Light]

@Northern Light the architecture style here reminds me of "Schwartz Reisman Innovation campus on U of T campus"

Very different podium level, but I see the allusion in respect of the towers.

 

[AlexBozikovic]

Note that the city is insisting on 40m tower separation here. That is completely unhinged.