Rascacielo

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
3,252
Reaction score
22,264
Today

DD95F614-5F86-4E83-99E5-F001FC5D0EE9.jpeg
 

ProjectEnd

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
13,073
Reaction score
30,978
This building is proof that Toronto developers need to ditch their obsession with balconies.
60 storey diving boards aren't helpful, but what I'd like to see is an increase in actual, livable, usable, outdoor space, as is common in the Lower Mainland. In all honesty, paying more attention to what's going on out west has completely black pilled me on our garbage development culture. There are few instances where folks pay so much for so little as in Toronto.

And this is Concord...

concord-metrotown-17.jpg


121228885_379014516839768_1979099920216184488_n.jpg


558sf in Toronto would be a 1+den or a small 2br.
floorplan-3yfr.jpeg
 

innsertnamehere

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
17,900
Reaction score
18,522
City:
Toronto
I heard somewhere that the city is starting to comment on applications that they don't want balconies wider than 1.5 metres.. so good luck with that!
 

Redroom Studios

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
4,056
Reaction score
183
I heard somewhere that the city is starting to comment on applications that they don't want balconies wider than 1.5 metres.. so good luck with that!
my sense is that refers to simple (square or rectangular projection) balconies and how far they stick out from the edges of the building. examples like shown above where the majority of the open space is still inside the footprint of the building shouldnt be affected. it would be an exceedingly limiting factor if it were the case.
 

ProjectEnd

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
13,073
Reaction score
30,978
I heard somewhere that the city is starting to comment on applications that they don't want balconies wider than 1.5 metres.. so good luck with that!
That was me. It's 1.6m. Clownish absurdity.
my sense is that refers to simple (square or rectangular projection) balconies and how far they stick out from the edges of the building. examples like shown above where the majority of the open space is still inside the footprint of the building shouldnt be affected. it would be an exceedingly limiting factor if it were the case.
But in a world where the City restricts developers to 750sm plates, it does affect us.
 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
24,190
Reaction score
63,387
That was me. It's 1.6m. Clownish absurdity.

But in a world where the City restricts developers to 750sm plates, it does affect us.

To hold a 4-seat table (tight), against the wall, and have a passing distance around the table to reach the far side, you require 1.8M minimum. To allow for a chair on a 3rd table side You need to add another .3M, .6M if you want a passing zone while someone is occupying said chair.

I've generally indicated that if we're going to build balconies (and I like them) we should make them functional. I would prefer a minimum width to a maximum and would favour 2.4M at peak point. (which must be sustained, for a minimum length of 1.8M)

Minimum over all m2 should also apply. I would argue for 12m2/129ft2)
 

Top