- Thread starter Paclo
- Start date
Kenojuak
Active Member
Hell yeah, here we go. Intensify all the way into the Bridle Path. Huge lots, high values. Can't wait to see development crack into this ridiculous estates-only zoned enclave.
UtakataNoAnnex
Senior Member
Looks like this will match the building to the south of this...
...and that's all I want to say for that. >.<
...and that's all I want to say for that. >.<
artyboy123
Senior Member
Taken from DevApp:
"An Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been submitted to permit the development of a 4 storey residential building containing 55 residential dwelling units with a gross floor area of 10,202 square metres (FSI of 1.4). Vehicular access is proposed off of Post Road and loading access is proposed off of Bayview Avenue. The proposal will provide 119 underground parking spaces."
DevApp: http://app.toronto.ca/AIC/index.do?folderRsn=a59WVlTl5fibMJDR80oNhQ==
Rendering taken from the architectural plan via Rezoning:
"An Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been submitted to permit the development of a 4 storey residential building containing 55 residential dwelling units with a gross floor area of 10,202 square metres (FSI of 1.4). Vehicular access is proposed off of Post Road and loading access is proposed off of Bayview Avenue. The proposal will provide 119 underground parking spaces."
DevApp: http://app.toronto.ca/AIC/index.do?folderRsn=a59WVlTl5fibMJDR80oNhQ==
Rendering taken from the architectural plan via Rezoning:
innsertnamehere
Superstar
2.16 parking spaces per unit - not surprising given the clientele and location herre, but still.. surprising.
This is under appeal at the OLT in the Case Management Conference phase (next CMC July 17): https://jus-olt-prod.powerappsporta...ails/?id=4c7e582b-70d6-ee11-904d-002248b17baa
And is the subject of an appeals report to council (staff remain opposed, no settlement proposal yet): https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245592.pdf
And is the subject of an appeals report to council (staff remain opposed, no settlement proposal yet): https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245592.pdf
Additional rendering:
AlbertC
Superstar
Northern Light
Superstar
I hadn't been paying much attention to this thread, having just give it a read through, I'm certainly supportive of intensification here, and the proposal is reasonably handsome.
Let me bring forward some context shots of the existing as we lack those.
This site is (currently), actually 8 and 10 Hyde Park Crescent, rather than 2 Post Road.
The current Post Road frontage:
Current Bayview frontage:
Hyde Park frontage:
Upon full review, I do take an issue w/the proposed landscape plan and the way the development addresses pedestrians (or does not)
Currently there is no sidewalk on the cul de sac; this plan does not provide for one either. Granted, in isolation, its pretty useless, but the plan should be for the City to install sidewalk on at least one side, back out to Post Road, and this development should pay for the section abutting its property.
Additionally, the proposal provides for only a very basic 2.1M wide sidewalk with no landscaped buffer between the sidewalk and the road on both the Bayview and the Post Road frontages.
I could perhaps see my way to letting that slide on Post Road, though I don't see why we should have to; but on the Bayview frontage that will make for fairly unpleasant walking conditions. The sidewalk should shift into the proposed private property landscaping, and a tree-lined boulevard should be added between the sidewalk and the curb on Bayview.
Let me bring forward some context shots of the existing as we lack those.
This site is (currently), actually 8 and 10 Hyde Park Crescent, rather than 2 Post Road.
The current Post Road frontage:
Current Bayview frontage:
Hyde Park frontage:
Upon full review, I do take an issue w/the proposed landscape plan and the way the development addresses pedestrians (or does not)
Currently there is no sidewalk on the cul de sac; this plan does not provide for one either. Granted, in isolation, its pretty useless, but the plan should be for the City to install sidewalk on at least one side, back out to Post Road, and this development should pay for the section abutting its property.
Additionally, the proposal provides for only a very basic 2.1M wide sidewalk with no landscaped buffer between the sidewalk and the road on both the Bayview and the Post Road frontages.
I could perhaps see my way to letting that slide on Post Road, though I don't see why we should have to; but on the Bayview frontage that will make for fairly unpleasant walking conditions. The sidewalk should shift into the proposed private property landscaping, and a tree-lined boulevard should be added between the sidewalk and the curb on Bayview.
Northern Light
Superstar
@Paclo
This one is the subject of a still confidential settlement offer to this week's meeting of City Council.
This one is the subject of a still confidential settlement offer to this week's meeting of City Council.
Northern Light
Superstar
Changes are as follows:
- Storeys increased from 4 to 5
- Height increased from 20.44 to 26.52m
- Total residential units increased from 55 to 62
- Total vehicular parking increased from 120 to 155
- Total bicycle parking increased from 57 to 60
AlbertC
Superstar
