Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
15,678
Reaction score
32,043
Adamson are still involved - their name is right there below KPMBs

700-Uni.png

Which plans are you looking at Chester?

Not saying your wrong...........maybe I'm just missing it......

When I look at the plans, this is what I see:

1632332086793.png

No sign of Adamson in that list

Don't see it on the right-hand side of the Doc either:

1632332177872.png
 

3Dementia

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
2,755
Reaction score
2,499

Attachments

  • 700Uni-site.jpg
    700Uni-site.jpg
    247.8 KB · Views: 29
  • 700Uni-N+E.jpg
    700Uni-N+E.jpg
    224.3 KB · Views: 27
  • 700Uni-S+W.jpg
    700Uni-S+W.jpg
    215.2 KB · Views: 28
  • 700Uni-TTC.jpg
    700Uni-TTC.jpg
    269.4 KB · Views: 32

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
25,044
Reaction score
25,943
City:
Toronto
Oops, you're right @ChesterCopperpot, I was looking at the June rezoning drawings. Thanks for the correction.
In the case where a firm is simply listed as Architect but another firm is listed as Design Architect, we list the Architect in the database file as Architect of Record. The thread titles only have space for one architectural firm, so the software chooses the Design Architect name (if one is filled in) as UT readers seem mostly to care about the look of the building and the inner workings not as much (totally understandable), so KPMB is now in the thread title. All the associated firms can be found in the database file.

42
 

realpolytics

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
9
Reaction score
7
Back up that accusation with some facts, or the post will be taken down, and you may lose posting privileges on UrbanToronto.

42
Apologies it wasn't meant as an accusation. To put it more politely - it is great to see such high density being approved so quickly and a sizeable section 37 benefit to go along with it. Good to see a well negotiated approval from Councilor Layton and planning staff in Ward 11 for which the benefits will go towards.

you can remove the comment?
 

UtakataNoAnnex

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 5, 2020
Messages
2,763
Reaction score
3,194
Apologies it wasn't meant as an accusation. To put it more politely - it is great to see such high density being approved so quickly and a sizeable section 37 benefit to go along with it. Good to see a well negotiated approval from Councilor Layton and planning staff in Ward 11 for which the benefits will go towards.

you can remove the comment?
You are are free to delete your own comment if you want to. But removing it may take away the context of your clarification.
 

smably

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
1,557
Reaction score
4,000
Apologies it wasn't meant as an accusation. To put it more politely - it is great to see such high density being approved so quickly and a sizeable section 37 benefit to go along with it. Good to see a well negotiated approval from Councilor Layton and planning staff in Ward 11 for which the benefits will go towards.
Guessing you meant to say "Mike Layton earning his pay", which sounds a lot less defamatory. ;)
 

Top