someMidTowner

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
9,340
Reaction score
15,109
August 9th:

IMG_4318.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4318.JPG
    IMG_4318.JPG
    2.3 MB · Views: 211

ADRM

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
5,558
Reaction score
16,410
This tower isn't catching enough flack around here. It's cheap-as-it-gets dogshit.

Podium is nice enough if rather generic, but it's a part of a nice little streetwall forming.

image.jpeg
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 179
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 198
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 194

junctionist

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
8,952
Reaction score
2,692
It's hard to tell if it's a good or bad building in terms of architecture. Hence, it's a little noir.
 

mcornett

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
394
Reaction score
1,404
I'm not sure why this tower is criticized so heavily. Sure, it's not as perfect as the renders suggest, but I look at it every day from my office and in decent lighting it is attractive. Certainly better than Pinnacle on Adelaide or even Charlie in my opinion, though not nearly as attractive as King Charlotte.
 

ADRM

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
5,558
Reaction score
16,410
I'm not sure why this tower is criticized so heavily. Sure, it's not as perfect as the renders suggest, but I look at it every day from my office and in decent lighting it is attractive. Certainly better than Pinnacle on Adelaide or even Charlie in my opinion, though not nearly as attractive as King Charlotte.

It's deservedly criticized because overt blandness and obvious cheapness are its two most prominent features.
 

Top