I'm sorry if my comment came off rude. I'm sure UT enjoys having new members join - that's how the site stays relevant. How long you have been a member has little to do with your ability to contribute to the conversation in a meaningful manner. You could have joined yesterday but are an architect with insider technical knowledge on the project who can blow any member on the site out the water.I have no idea what you're trying to say given you're also a new member and the two renders are of the same site.
Granted the first render is the way back original proposal that I believe was like 350m and immediately shot down and was overhauled into what was finally approved by Cresford, but the overall sentiment remains and it is certainly the same site
But coming in here and posting a mirror image of the tower (your second photo is a mirror image) while simply stating it's not good enough, brings the level of this discussion down to just plain banal.
I enjoy reading one liners but those are masterfully done by veteran members on the site and can be quite the provocation on your thoughts on and perception of a particular project.