News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 30K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 2.9K     0 

toronto647

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
524
Reaction score
1,000
Officially the handover to Metrolinx is still scheduled for September 21st. Nobody is expecting it to open then, with Metrolinx saying it will open later once testing is done, but Crosslinx is supposed to have the line ready for occupancy by then.

Which likely won't be happening.
I don't get why they are not publicly disclosing that the opening is pushed to next year? What is the rationale here? Are they waiting for the city elections to be finished? or waiting till its transferred to the TTC and then blame them for further delay? Like what is the reasoning as wouldn't it make sense to get ahead of the story. Proactive rather than reactive
 

allengeorge

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
3,283
I’m not sure what benefit there is to announcing the date. The media/public is going to say it’s late regardless, and if it slips again for whatever reason MX/TTC/politicians are going to wear egg on their faces. At this point I would just stay silent and only announce something 2-3 months out from revenue operation when I was fairly confident of hitting my target.
 

trtcttc

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 16, 2019
Messages
131
Reaction score
526

crs1026

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
13,930
Find it funny that the “original” photo they had has a giant graffiti right in the middle. If no one bothered to remove it back then, how important is this “heritage” building anyways that it needed to be rebuilt.

Why would a heritage structure be immune from attracting grafitti?

And if you knew the building was about to be reconstructed - wouldn’t you wait and let the people doing the reconstruction remove any grafitti as part of that work ?

- Paul
 

trtcttc

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 16, 2019
Messages
131
Reaction score
526
Why would a heritage structure be immune from attracting grafitti?

And if you knew the building was about to be reconstructed - wouldn’t you wait and let the people doing the reconstruction remove any grafitti as part of that work ?

- Paul
It won’t be immune, but if it’s of so little importance to people why bother spending the money and time rebuilding it. I wonder how much money and time wasted for useless “heritage“ features in Toronto, like the ugly train shed at Union.
 

ARG1

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 28, 2020
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
4,978
City:
Toronto
It won’t be immune, but if it’s of so little importance to people why bother spending the money and time rebuilding it. I wonder how much money and time wasted for useless “heritage“ features in Toronto, like the ugly train shed at Union.
idk, I think the train shed is lovely.
 

Richard White

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
5,288
Reaction score
3,591
City:
Toronto
It won’t be immune, but if it’s of so little importance to people why bother spending the money and time rebuilding it. I wonder how much money and time wasted for useless “heritage“ features in Toronto, like the ugly train shed at Union.

That train shed has so much heritage protection they can't fully demolish it.
 

daniel_kryz

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 10, 2020
Messages
450
Reaction score
897
I'm not sure what all the fuss is about.

The train shed is very ugly and isn't an integral part of Union Station. The head house (with the columns and great hall) is the true gem... therefore not replacing train shed WAS a mistake.
This building is beautiful and adds character to this intersection. Therefore, this transit project should, and did, restore it to its former glory.

Or are we now against heritage preservation? By that, I mean true heritage... not protecting worthless buildings as a cynical way to prevent development.
 

T3G

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Messages
130
Reaction score
247
It won’t be immune, but if it’s of so little importance to people why bother spending the money and time rebuilding it. I wonder how much money and time wasted for useless “heritage“ features in Toronto, like the ugly train shed at Union.
Probably next to zero, considering Toronto by and large cares nothing for its heritage and demolishes historically significant buildings and vehicles at the slightest provocation.

Praise be to the exemptions.
 

PL1

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
192
Reaction score
103
Backfill at Leaside (Bayview) nearing road level. Fri, Aug 19.
IMG_20220819_164047.jpg
IMG_20220819_163819.jpg
 

Top