Automation Gallery
Superstar
184 SPADINA AVE Ward 10 - Tor & E.York District | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
- Thread starter Automation Gallery
- Start date
Toronto1834
Active Member
Didn't LPAT already confirm that this block is limited to 12 storeys through the 170 Spadina appeal? That was under the old OMB rules too, so why would this developer expect a different outcome?
Marcanadian
Moderator
Sweeny&Co:
app.toronto.ca
Application Information Centre
Search for details about current planning applications and Minor variance and Consent applications. Application Information Centre For best results, please use the latest version of Microsoft IE/Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. The Application Information Centre allows you to: Search by...
app.toronto.ca
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Interesting that we are having these two tower hotel proposals of late.
AoD
AoD
mikejb
Active Member
Looks like it is the same group that is behind this on on Richmond - https://www.blogto.com/real-estate-toronto/2019/07/downtown-toronto-getting-two-new-boutique-hotels/
ProjectEnd
Superstar
Curious, this one is also Manga Hotels (same as 471 Richmond Street West).
mikejb
Active Member
Great minds snoop alike, and a minute apart
smably
Senior Member
Too bad this doesn't include the small parking lot to the south:
That gap will exist in the streetwall forever now.
That gap will exist in the streetwall forever now.
AlbertC
Superstar
Would've been nice to get all of the parking space filled in. Although from my understanding, the tricky part is that the small lot to the south belongs to 174 Spadina Ave which remains as a separate property division.
PMT
Senior Member
Preliminary Report:
AlbertC
Superstar
Manga Hotels keeps faith in hospitality, and downtown Toronto
Manga Hotels is in the early stages of its most ambitious growth phase, with one downtown Toronto property under construction and four more hotels planned. “We have faith in the city and have a long-term view,” company president and chief
renx.ca
Northern Light
Superstar
Docs were updated here on June 1st, 2021:
From the cover letter:
From the cover letter:
NY99
Active Member
Why wouldn't it be able to be developed in the future?
smably
Senior Member
Too small to meet the city's requirements for loading and servicing.
concrete_and_light
Active Member
It could be developed as part of a redevelopment of or addition to 174 Spadina though, I imagine? If they decided to redevelop their site or add on to the existing building.
The area could also be adapted in the future for different uses as well, such as a patio space for a restaurant or cafe if they adapted the building to support that kind of use, or an area for food trucks or a landscaped amenity space for the adjacent building. It will also maintain some visibility of the nice old warehouse architecture and windows of 174 Spadina, so all in all I don't mind having a small gap in the streetwall here.
The area could also be adapted in the future for different uses as well, such as a patio space for a restaurant or cafe if they adapted the building to support that kind of use, or an area for food trucks or a landscaped amenity space for the adjacent building. It will also maintain some visibility of the nice old warehouse architecture and windows of 174 Spadina, so all in all I don't mind having a small gap in the streetwall here.
Last edited: