elcorrerador

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Messages
98
Reaction score
101
I don't want to derail the thread but is there any news about more grocery stores coming in the area?
I thought I had seen Farmboy mentioned in one of the other threads.
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
26,376
Reaction score
32,178
City:
Toronto

evandyk

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 22, 2019
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
6,037
There was also some talk about a grocery store opening in the Power building at Adelaide and Power, but I'm not sure if that will happen now. There is a smaller grocery store opening in Canary on Front St.

There is also hoarding for an Italian store in the Daniels building, but that predates the pandemic, so I'm pretty skeptical that will happen.
 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
23,104
Reaction score
58,588
From the Report above:

Summary of changes from original proposal:

1655486750747.png


S. 37 benefits:

1655486524292.png


As part of the Transportation Demand Management program:

1655486592281.png


Final Report https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-227520.pdf

Not clear if the No Frills is going to be continuing but it is mentioned.

The Loading standards are revelatory:

Loading
Three Type B and three Type C loading spaces are proposed. One Type C and all three
Type B spaces would be provided within a consolidated at-grade loading area at the
west end of the site, accessed via a vehicle turntable. In addition, two Type C loading
spaces are provided on the P1 parking level, one beneath each of the new buildings.
Notably, a Type A loading space is not provided, as it was determined that the
reconfigured ground floor retail space will result in the loss or downsizing of the existing
grocery store use, for which the loading needs could be met using the smaller Type B
spaces provided. In addition
, a Type G space is not provided, as the proposed location
of the site’s consolidated loading area within the existing Northwest Office Building does
not provide the necessary vertical clearance. As such, private waste collection is
proposed to serve residential needs.
 

dusk

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
253
Reaction score
593
From the Report above:

Summary of changes from original proposal:

View attachment 408149

S. 37 benefits:

View attachment 408144

As part of the Transportation Demand Management program:

View attachment 408145



The Loading standards are revelatory:

Loading
Three Type B and three Type C loading spaces are proposed. One Type C and all three
Type B spaces would be provided within a consolidated at-grade loading area at the
west end of the site, accessed via a vehicle turntable. In addition, two Type C loading
spaces are provided on the P1 parking level, one beneath each of the new buildings.
Notably, a Type A loading space is not provided, as it was determined that the
reconfigured ground floor retail space will result in the loss or downsizing of the existing
grocery store use, for which the loading needs could be met using the smaller Type B
spaces provided. In addition
, a Type G space is not provided, as the proposed location
of the site’s consolidated loading area within the existing Northwest Office Building does
not provide the necessary vertical clearance. As such, private waste collection is
proposed to serve residential needs.
I do worry about the future of the No Frills here. Are there no frills in the city that occupy a space 50% plus or minus of the current location? I'm not aware of any.

I am concerned that an "upscale" grocery store will enter the space and squeeze residents, many of which rely on the relative affordability of the No Frills.
 

Jonny5

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 23, 2007
Messages
3,775
Reaction score
1,731
I do worry about the future of the No Frills here. Are there no frills in the city that occupy a space 50% plus or minus of the current location? I'm not aware of any.

I am concerned that an "upscale" grocery store will enter the space and squeeze residents, many of which rely on the relative affordability of the No Frills.
50% larger for sure with the Dufferin Mall store which is huge. Some of the ones on the edge of the inner/outer suburbs are like that too. I'm not sure about 50% smaller, but the Parliament store is definitely smaller, but probably only about 15%-20% or so.
 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
23,104
Reaction score
58,588
I do worry about the future of the No Frills here. Are there no frills in the city that occupy a space 50% plus or minus of the current location? I'm not aware of any.

A fair few actually.

The Parliament Street store, I think, is the smallest No Frills in the City, at ~13,500ft2

The one on Bloor West (just west of /High Park) is under 15,000ft2

The very first No Frills is still operating at Victoria Park and St.Clair and is well under 15,000ft2

****

The existing store is well over 30,000ft2, so all of the above are well below 50% of the current footprint.
 

dusk

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
253
Reaction score
593
A fair few actually.

The Parliament Street store, I think, is the smallest No Frills in the City, at ~13,500ft2

The one on Bloor West (just west of /High Park) is under 15,000ft2

The very first No Frills is still operating at Victoria Park and St.Clair and is well under 15,000ft2

****

The existing store is well over 30,000ft2, so all of the above are well below 50% of the current footprint.
Thank you for the info! That’s helpful :)
 

jsmith77

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
388
Reaction score
1,571
All makes perfect sense I suppose, building affordable housing on two large sites within 500m or so, then cut access to affordable groceries. Crazy to think of how long the lines are at No Frills at its current size and how much worse that will get with increased population and smaller footprint.
 

elcorrerador

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Messages
98
Reaction score
101
All makes perfect sense I suppose, building affordable housing on two large sites within 500m or so, then cut access to affordable groceries. Crazy to think of how long the lines are at No Frills at its current size and how much worse that will get with increased population and smaller footprint.
It's very bad. They also don't have self checkout machines there. They should because lots of people go to grab a couple of things after work.
Rush hour is the worst time to go
 

Top