smably

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
1,807
Reaction score
5,512
This building doesn't look cheap to me though? Sure, it's subtle and unflashy and from a distance it looks like your standard commercial glass box, but the detailing (what's been done so far, at least) looks top-notch. Lots of good stuff yet to come. The understatedness is by design, so as not to compete with City Hall, not a result of cheapening.
 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
32,531
Reaction score
27,181
City:
Toronto
This building doesn't look cheap to me though? Sure, it's subtle and unflashy and from a distance it looks like your standard commercial glass box, but the detailing (what's been done so far, at least) looks top-notch. Lots of good stuff yet to come. The understatedness is by design, so as not to compete with City Hall, not a result of cheapening.

It's good, but definitely not as good as what RPBW is capable of.

AoD
 

junctionist

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
9,313
Reaction score
3,657
Our "local design industry" had plenty of chances with the IO courthouse portfolio - and was in the running for this project as well. The proposal spoke for itself.

AoD

Do you have a link to the locally designed proposals? I feel that Hariri Pontarini or Teeple could have done better. Just because they wanted to be respectful to City Hall doesn't mean it had to be bland. You can have multiple landmarks existing in harmony.
 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
32,531
Reaction score
27,181
City:
Toronto
Do you have a link to the locally designed proposals? I feel that Hariri Pontarini or Teeple could have done better. Just because they wanted to be respectful to City Hall doesn't mean it had to be bland. You can have multiple landmarks existing in harmony.

@ProjectEnd already provided the rendering for one - and you can't "feel" if a firm could do better if they didn't take part in submitting a proposal or make the cut.

Speaking of this project - IO posted the Summer 2022 update (with interior pics):


And the architectural mast didn't get cut - it will be installed this summer. Phew,.

AoD
 
Last edited:

ProjectEnd

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
13,365
Reaction score
32,774
Do you have a link to the locally designed proposals? I feel that Hariri Pontarini or Teeple could have done better. Just because they wanted to be respectful to City Hall doesn't mean it had to be bland. You can have multiple landmarks existing in harmony.
It doesn't work that way. You need to be 'vetted' (and rightfully so, at times). Hence there were no 'HPA' or 'Teeple' efforts.
 

junctionist

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
9,313
Reaction score
3,657
Yeah, right. You guys are probably just biased against local design…

Look at something like the Perimeter Institute for a large public building impressively designed by Saucier and Perrotte and Teeple. HPA has a handful of better landmark projects in its portfolio as well.
 
Last edited:

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
32,531
Reaction score
27,181
City:
Toronto
Yeah, right. You guys are probably just biased against local design…

Look at something like the Perimeter Institute for a large public building impressively designed by Saucier and Perrotte and Teeple. HPA has a handful of better landmark projects in its portfolio as well.

As if "we" somehow prompted IO- - because we apparently have that power - to make a choice for RPBW over the local firm - when a) you didn't even know that there was a local firm in the running and b) didn't know what they proposed, even though it's been posted here ages ago. In the meantime, practically the entire IO courthouse portfolio is handled by local firms - and neither SP, Teeple nor HPA got any of the jobs (large or small). Biased against local design? After seeing what our local firms in this "genre" offered (there is also the somewhat contemporaneous Calgary Courts Centre as an example of a similar scale) , you bet I am wanting a breath of fresh air.

AoD
 
Last edited:

Johnny Au

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
8,673
Reaction score
16,113
June 25, 2022:

IMG_5218.jpeg
IMG_5219.jpeg
IMG_5220.jpeg
IMG_5227.jpeg
IMG_5228.jpeg
IMG_5229.jpeg
IMG_5230.jpeg
IMG_5231.jpeg
IMG_5232.jpeg
 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
32,531
Reaction score
27,181
City:
Toronto
From the Renzo Piano exhibition at Harbourfront Centre (until Sep 11, well worth seeing!). I didn’t know there would be a courtyard / atrium on the 16th floor (second photo). Not sure if they’ll actually plant the trees though …

View attachment 414939

View attachment 414940


The Winter 2022 IO update show the interior courtyard with trees.

AoD
 

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
32,531
Reaction score
27,181
City:
Toronto
UT article about the exhibition:


Though it should be corrected - this isn't the first high-rise courthouse project in Canada - I believe the Calgary Courts Centre would be (and it's a taller/larger building); 180 Queen West is "sort of" one, but it's more a mixed used project.

AoD
 

dusk

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Messages
274
Reaction score
665
Anyone else hate the first few floors of this? It just looks so "busy". Maybe it's just me.
 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
25,568
Reaction score
68,759
Photos taken yesterday, August 9th, 2022:

We'll start with a simple shot, not of the building (primarily), but of the sidewalk on Chestnut.....as part of this project, both sides of Chestnut, Centre, and Armoury are getting new sidewalks/streetscapes.

DSC09003.JPG


The new streetscape on the south side of Armoury is now complete:


DSC09011.JPG



Now the building, with a bit of focus on soffit work:

DSC09005.JPG


DSC09006.JPG


DSC09007.JPG


DSC09008.JPG


DSC09009.JPG


DSC09010.JPG


DSC09012.JPG
 

Top