Why are the replacements only at three to one? Metrolinx's tree replacement policy if MUCH greater than that, for very large trees.

Unless they changed their rules after they got called out for not following it for the Small's Creek replacements.
 
If anything Metrolinx should spend extra money and plant more mature trees instead of matchsticks so they establish a more pronounced canopy quicker.
 
yrt+viva=1system said:
If anything Metrolinx should spend extra money and plant more mature trees instead of matchsticks so they establish a more pronounced canopy quicker.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't matter, the roots for these trees will not be able to get deep enough to reach the same level of growth the current ones did.
 
picard102 said:
Wouldn't matter, the roots for these trees will not be able to get deep enough to reach the same level of growth the current ones did.
Click to expand...
They might at Osgoode - I thought the tree removals there were for access more so than the small station entrance.

Moss Park is literally over the station - so it depends how deep the station is - it isn't shallow.
 
nfitz said:
They might at Osgoode - I thought the tree removals there were for access more so than the small station entrance.

Moss Park is literally over the station - so it depends how deep the station is - it isn't shallow.
Click to expand...
Trees cannot be planted anywhere on the keyhole site.
The station headhouse only takes up the south end.

From the factum:
JDDOytBnS.JPG

CvuYDOtgMN.JPG
 
From the Factum, Metrolinx explaining why they think they need to build the new Northeast entrance


1676217567180.png
1676217581759.png
1676217599692.png
1676217634147.png
1676217669678.png
 
Osgoode Station Info

1676217766125.png
1676217796812.png
1676217833845.png
 
Metrolinx reasoning behind not using alternatives to chosen station design

1676218055447.png
1676218067812.png
1676218086235.png
1676218100563.png
1676218124876.png
1676218143899.png
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top