interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
26,539
Reaction score
33,161
City:
Toronto
Database file coming soon, but in the meantime, here is the first rendering:

11_Future Ontario Line Pape Station entrance on the north side of Danforth Ave, east of Pape Ave.jpg
 

Red_Bulmer

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
70
Reaction score
129
I'm very baffled by this one. Why not just put it in one of the buildings at the corner of Pape? Really destroying the gorgeous historical streetscape. Why does this require such a behemoth chunk of the city? It's as big as suburban GO Station. Also what is with the material choice for the outside? That wood sticks out in a bad way and is going to need constant upkeep, anything else would have been a better choice. I'm really pissed off about this one. The Scotiabank on the corner would have been an obvious and ideal location.

1648416781221.png
 
Last edited:

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
26,539
Reaction score
33,161
City:
Toronto
I'm very baffled by this one. Why not just put it in one of the buildings at the corner of Pape? Really destroying the gorgeous historical streetscape. Why does this require such a behemoth chunk of the city? It's as big as suburban GO Station. Also what is with the material choice for the outside? That wood sticks out in a bad way and is going to need constant upkeep, anything else would have been a better choice. I'm really pissed off about this one. The Scotiabank on the corner would have been an obvious and ideal location.

View attachment 388169
The reason they are putting it where they are is that the station box is underneath where they'll be removing that building, not underneath Pape itself. Here's the neighbourhood context map:

olta_north_segment_maps_mx_engage_pape_20220203_final.png


Meanwhile, no way that'll be wood. Plus, here's hoping this is designed for a building to rise above it.

42
 

Red_Bulmer

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
70
Reaction score
129
The reason they are putting it where they are is that the station box is underneath where they'll be removing that building, not underneath Pape itself.
Meanwhile, no way that'll be wood. Plus, here's hoping this is designed for a building to rise above it.

42
So? The underground station building could be right there and there could very easily be a diagonal walking tunnel to the corner where an entrance is, it's a shorter distance than to the other station. Could they not build the station box without having to cut and cover? We have stations with long walking tunnels on University Avenue. Why would we want 2 subway entrances both on the Northeast corner?
 

TossYourJacket

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Messages
1,138
Reaction score
2,923
So? The underground station building could be right there and there could very easily be a diagonal walking tunnel to the corner where an entrance is, it's a shorter distance than to the other station. Could they not build the station box without having to cut and cover? We have stations with long walking tunnels on University Avenue. Why would we want 2 subway entrances both on the Northeast corner?
To be fair, I wouldn't say "long walking tunnels" are generally a desirable aspect of any transit station. But yeah, ideally this could be designed to occupy way less less street frontage along Danforth.
 

Red October

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jul 20, 2010
Messages
2,356
Reaction score
332
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. This would be as baffling as some of the ECLRT station decisions. If the London Underground can incorporate station entrances while maintaining good unbroken retail stretches in the 1800s we can in the 2020s.
 

innsertnamehere

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
18,641
City:
Toronto
there isn't a formal Transit Oriented Community plan released here yet, but I strongly suspect there will be one as Metrolinx is expropriating basically the entire block.
 

marcus_a_j

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,381
Reaction score
1,798
The most important aspect about this station is how the transfers between Line 2 and OL are dealt with. While ensuring that the station can support additional above and that there's an entrance on Danforth are important elements, these take a back seat to the transfer between lines IMO. The whole point of the OL/Relief Line is to intercept riders going downtown before getting to Yonge/Line 1. Obviously not all riders will transfer lines at Pape, but many will whether they are going to Union, East Harbour or anywhere else along the OL.
 

Derek Pearce

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Seems like it takes away too much from the existing retail streetscape. If they could build tall rental above and have more retail at ground floor it’d be better for the neighbourhood.
 

Ward8

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 6, 2020
Messages
218
Reaction score
671
I just find the GIANT setback offensive. The basic functionality of the street is wonderful and lively. Having a random inset will disrupt the streetwall in negative ways. If the buildings beside it were designed with a plaza in mind it would maybe work, but this isn't great compared to the other stations. They'd be better off having the "setback" take place inside the eventual station if they think they need the room.
 

Top