Benito

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
6,494
Reaction score
34,426
This afternoon.
6A1DE73A-2A1B-45C5-8423-864C423B95B1.jpeg
EEEBF5A8-F5FB-45B7-AAC5-F0EBACA8D17A.jpeg
3D0E2FAF-63DB-41A2-A5A3-D8D9FF74CFFD.jpeg
0BB0ED19-72B9-4CE3-B779-4065CFB69CF8.jpeg
3D808CD1-96AF-499B-AF24-1F656533C5D7.jpeg
83950231-C98D-4C1D-9317-C05904A3137D.jpeg
 

rocket301

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jun 4, 2019
Messages
32
Reaction score
120
Scale model of Wellesley on the Park

20150824_171500.jpg



Original development proposal of Wellesley on the Park

CYMERA_20140324_105748.jpg



Advertisement of Wellesley on the Park

CYMERA_20140515_174327.jpg



Look back Wellesley on the Park area from Wellesley station at 2014

CYMERA_20140626_195100.jpg



Wellesley on the Park at 2015

20150801_120037.jpg



Wellesley on the Park view from Wellesley & Bay at 2015

20150704_155318.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bilked

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
1,540
Reaction score
7,882
Not that it’s a surprise... but it’s still so frustrating to see how compromised this new park will be by the Bay Club condo’s private roundabout. Both branches of the roundabout are actually quite wide and perfectly capable on their own of permitting access to their garage.

Sadly, with a road splitting this space in two, it’ll provide a few new trees, but really won’t function as much of a park. The green space, nevertheless, will impact upon property owners to the south (ie their ability to build due to the City’s incremental shadowing concerns).

Not sure why we treat the property rights of the Bay Club (and their condo board’s inane concerns about having TWO private roads to access their parking garage) with kid gloves but then aggressively enforce shadowing restrictions to the detriment of property rights to owners to the south (and their ability to deliver new housing).

Would this not have been a prime candidate for the use of expropriation powers? What’s the fair market value of an undevelopable sliver of land that’s totally redundant to a property’s vehicle entry/exit requirements? You’d think it would be modest or negligible. Any reason expropriation powers couldn’t be invoked to fix this park in the future? I imagine the community may take more interest in this when they see how compromised this much vaunted new downtown park really is.

If you own at the Bay Club - fire your Board! The community deserves better than this!

EE2720FB-E7B2-48E4-9985-8002A019B4DA.jpeg
21827FDF-DDAB-4C18-92B5-33D6D7AB2E89.jpeg
36EEE5D9-B6A9-46B8-AAD6-A9B47477BB13.jpeg
 

Top