[buildings]

some info on reddit (which I tried to bring over but was thwarted). The building abutting the Roxy on the south side suffered foundation damage during the excavations for the Roxy rebuild. Owner sued both the contractor and the Roxy. and the matter is still before the courts. Having said that, The Roxy isn't finished because the Roxy admin doesn't want to spend any money while the suit is still up in the air.

If you wish to look further, search reddit (r/Edmonton) for the following thread.

Why is the Roxy Theatre building unfinished?​

 

[archited]

Too bad, because if they don't do something soon the law suit will look like "small potatoes" compared to the damage mitigation for an "open Construction site".

 

[buildings]

already 3 years of sun, rain and snow.... whatever the outcome of the lawsuit, Roxy should protect its investment. Sounding like sour grapes and smash your own face.

 

[jwroller]

Probably sometime after the owner of the adjacent building has croaked, or has struck a deal with Theatre Network due to blackmail involving a hooker, a flock of sheep, a suicidal pre-teen and a shipment of fentanyl.

Your statement implies the adjacent building owner is blackmailing someone in the Theatre network for having sex with a hooker, sheep and a teenager? And has something to do with fentanyl?

 

[strata]

^ You created a new account just to post that message?

 

[jwroller]

^ You created a new account just to post that message?

I did.

The commenters attempt at “comedy” did the exact opposite they intended.
They’ve implied that blackmail has held up the work.

So has the adjacent building owner been involved sexually with a hooker, preteen, flock or sheep and something to do with fentanyl…
So if the Roxy was blackmailing him I’m sure that the work would be done by now.

But as it stands with the work not being done if can be inferred that the southern building owner has the upper hand and is blackmailing someone at the Roxy.
So who at the Roxy is a pedophile, prositute, beastiality committing… drug dealer/user?

I’m just trying to disgust and wrap my mind around the statement that’s been presented.
And if this is simple a matter of the poster being a moron that’s fine.
But as it stands they directly attacked someone’s character and I’m trying to understand who’s.

 

[Dubas]

I did.

The commenters attempt at “comedy” did the exact opposite they intended.
They’ve implied that blackmail has held up the work.

So has the adjacent building owner been involved sexually with a hooker, preteen, flock or sheep and something to do with fentanyl…
So if the Roxy was blackmailing him I’m sure that the work would be done by now.

But as it stands with the work not being done if can be inferred that the southern building owner has the upper hand and is blackmailing someone at the Roxy.
So who at the Roxy is a pedophile, prositute, beastiality committing… drug dealer/user?

I’m just trying to disgust and wrap my mind around the statement that’s been presented.
And if this is simple a matter of the poster being a moron that’s fine.
But as it stands they directly attacked someone’s character and I’m trying to understand who’s.

Get a life...

 

[jwroller]

Get a life...

You do see where the original poster fell short right?
Or is this a circle jerk of nepotism and half baked attempts to disparage people you don’t know?
Should I have not stumbled upon this and expressed my thoughts?

 

[ChazYEG]

You do see where the original poster fell short right?
Or is this a circle jerk of nepotism and half baked attempts to disparage people you don’t know?
Should I have not stumbled upon this and expressed my thoughts?

Bud, get a life.

 

[jwroller]

All I’ve done is point out their error.

 

[ChazYEG]

All I’ve done is point out their error.

You clearly lack any sort of sense of humour.
Ffs, a tongue-in-cheek comment and you're gearing up for war. Take a chill pill, buddy

 

[Platinum107]

You do see where the original poster fell short right?
Or is this a circle jerk of nepotism and half baked attempts to disparage people you don’t know?
Should I have not stumbled upon this and expressed my thoughts?

This is an urban development nerd forum, not Facebook. I don't like it when people say stupid stuff on here either but like, it's never that serious dude. If you like urban development then check out some of the other threads on here!

 

[buildings]

^fastest ignore I've ever done.

 

[jwroller]

^fastest ignore I've ever done.

Cowards tend to turn away when they have nothing to say.
This is what I expected.

 

[crisp]

When I see people saying they're ignoring/blocking a person it's usually for valid reason. Reading this thread though, I don't see why y'all so butt hurt about @jwroller? To me it seems like @gronk is the one that has an obsession with the Roxy and is angry about the property feud, making some shitty attempt at "sense if hunour" out of anger. Pretty valid to question it IMO...