Looks like they discovered a utility that they didn’t know was there. Unfortunate, but these things happen. Hopefully the change order isn’t too expensive…
Most utilities in that area would likely be close to original (for example a water line they removed recently contained asbestos). That long ago, city records would likely be incomplete if a utility line was placed unknown to them for whatever reason. It’s pretty rare to happen, I think this is the second time on the VLW project. Sometimes they don’t know something is there until they dig it up.How many utilities are old utilities? If there are streetcar tracks at 142 Street, or old concrete blocks in the North Saskatchewan River, how many things does Marigold have control over?
There's switching right before that intersection, but nothing else until you get past Bonnie Doon. So you're probably right.I do wonder why it took so long to get the tramline running, don't think they have enough crossovers to drive past these collisions...
That seems like a pretty big design flaw to me (granted, I'm not someone who would know the norms here).There's switching right before that intersection, but nothing else until you get past Bonnie Doon. So you're probably right.
I'm open to crossing arms on this southern industrial park section tbh. I know it'll slow down vehicle traffic, but that's these driver's fault.
Probably because of the number of officers and locations that would be involved. Enforcement of anything is a problem which is why as the city adds more complexity and rules, more get ignored.I don't understand why peace officers aren't sitting at the no right on red signs along the LRT and the bike lanes. Easy red light fines...
Interesting stat. Looks like all of ETS had 5.3 million trips in May 2024 which means 212,000 trips on Valley line for an average of 6839 riders per day.Heard today that VL lrt ridership makes up 0.4% of all transit usage in Edmonton.
I wonder what the city's targets are?