News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
Why would the union come out and say something like this now?

The union is not the cause of any delay at this point. Drivers have been training for a year. I doubt the union would want to step in the crosshairs for a delay when the TTC and Metrolinx have both signed off that Line 5 is good to go.
 
The union is not the cause of any delay at this point. Drivers have been training for a year. I doubt the union would want to step in the crosshairs for a delay when the TTC and Metrolinx have both signed off that Line 5 is good to go.
When they would offer the union some incentive to keep quiet?
 
Minister of Transportation basically said they're handing it over to the TTC within 2 weeks and they could open anytime after that. Essentially throwing it into the TTC's court to open before year's end so they can finally wash their hands of this...."ask the TTC - we handed it over to them."

TTC has to deal with the union.
 
They also mentioned more training - what on earth are you still training at this point? If they have operated the line in a revenue demo for 30 days, they know what they need to know.
 
My opinion: the union (i.e. representing the future operators) wants to know what happened in the yard accident/collision. Metrolinx/Crosslinx isn't saying because the line hasn't been handed over to TTC yet, so they figure tey need not (or are contractually bound not to) share the details.
 
I, on the contrary, wonder if this will cause further delay, I.e., the union refused to let drivers operate the line out of "safety" concerns...

the only thing they'll likely discover is that one of the switches in the yard track was misconfigured and that it's now fixed.

In the years that passed since the original training, they probably need to replace the retirees - and those who have died from old age.

/s ? it's only been less than a year since they trained the operators...
 

Back
Top