blue12
Active Member
People have been accusing her of that. There's no indication it actually happened. I'm no Smith fan either but it's just a baseless excuse.You mean she paid someone money to do the flight?
People have been accusing her of that. There's no indication it actually happened. I'm no Smith fan either but it's just a baseless excuse.You mean she paid someone money to do the flight?
I would say that Edmonton does a pretty good job of promoting tourism. I always see ads for festivals in Edmonton, and clearly Edmonton has a good system of attracting festival goers from around the province. I find Calgary doesn't push tourism for 'Calgary' itself, but instead piggybacks off the tourism for Banff. Rather than events, Calgary's tourism is geared at offering permanent venues to out of country or out of province people who spend a day or two in Calgary en route to Banff. Venues like Heritage Park, the Zoo, the Calgary etc.. tower seem to be the popular venues that people visit, and as far as I know Calgary doesn't even advertise those venues.For a long time Travel Alberta focused mostly on promoting tourism to the mountains. I realize that may be changing some, but Edmonton itself also has to step up to facilitate and promote tourism more too.
Look at those companies now......Shell pulled out of YYC and has 1 telephone operator, BP - 5-6 folks, Conoco - ghost town, CNOOC (Nexen) - 300 folks, Ovintiv (EnCana) - 300 (YYC is merely a field office - I know this cause I contracted for them for 14 yrs), Imperial - will be down to a telephone operator in a year, Husky - gone, Devon - gone, Chevron - gone, Marathon - gone, Statoil - gone, Suncor - Yes - about 2,000 in YYC, Syncrude - synergized with Suncor - so part of the 2,000 Suncor. So it looks like we avoided the evitable......Not so fast. At one time Imperial, oil Shell, Syncrude, Suncor among others had their regional offices in Edmonton until Lougheed asked (told) them to move along with all of the regulatory departments. Edmontonians were indeed to blame for going along with this and continually going along with it and voting conservative for the next 40 years.
Yes that's correct. The Alberta government bought the controlling share and they moved their head office to Calgary. It's not the only thing that made Calgary the hub though. They already had more international tourists due to geography, and it would have been the hub either way.Lougheed bought PWA with the explicit purpose of moving the head office from Vancouver and the centre of opposition from Edmonton to Calgary to make them the hub they are today.
Yes & when I travel to Calgary - I always enjoyI would say that Edmonton does a pretty good job of promoting tourism. I always see ads for festivals in Edmonton, and clearly Edmonton has a good system of attracting festival goers from around the province. I find Calgary doesn't push tourism for 'Calgary' itself, but instead piggybacks off the tourism for Banff. Rather than events, Calgary's tourism is geared at offering permanent venues to out of country or out of province people who spend a day or two in Calgary en route to Banff. Venues like Heritage Park, the Zoo, the Calgary etc.. tower seem to be the popular venues that people visit, and as far as I know Calgary doesn't even advertise those venues.
Tourism Alberta still focuses on the mountains more than anything. Calgary and Edmonton get thrown in a bit, but it's clear what brings tourists to the province.
Maybe you avoided the inevitable, or maybe not. Calgary having all those head office jobs allowed Calgary to build a larger skilled labor pool, and it's been a big help in Calgary's evolution towards being a different city. According to your post Calgary has lost thousands of oil and gas jobs, and it's probably true. This is exactly what Calgarians want to see. If these jobs were killing our economy it would be a different story, instead Calgary's workforce has grown by 160,000 in the past 5 years, and the city has grown by 300,00. Even more striking is that the city's tech workforce has doubled from 30,000 to 60,000. Making it one of the fastest growing in NA the past 5 years. And, yes, tech jobs, and no, they aren't call centre jobs.Look at those companies now......Shell pulled out of YYC and has 1 telephone operator, BP - 5-6 folks, Conoco - ghost town, CNOOC (Nexen) - 300 folks, Ovintiv (EnCana) - 300 (YYC is merely a field office - I know this cause I contracted for them for 14 yrs), Imperial - will be down to a telephone operator in a year, Husky - gone, Devon - gone, Chevron - gone, Marathon - gone, Statoil - gone, Suncor - Yes - about 2,000 in YYC, Syncrude - synergized with Suncor - so part of the 2,000 Suncor. So it looks like we avoided the evitable......
| North American Rank | City | Number of Workers | Employment Growth 2021-2024 | ||
| 3 | Toronto | 334,200 | 14.7% | ||
| 7 | Kitchener Waterloo | 39,400 | 58.2% | ||
| 10 | Vancouver | 125,100 | 5.2% | ||
| 11 | Ottawa | 95,900 | 13.2% | ||
| 15 | Montreal | 154,900 | 6.9% | ||
| 17 | Calgary | 64,600 | 61.1% | ||
| 43 | Edmonton | 32,300 | -1.2% | ||
| Unranked | Winnipeg | 21,000 | 10% |
You are correct. Voting patterns in Alberta didn’t change for many decades until DS made her ill advised floor crossing that gave the NDP credibility. Now the divide is more visible in the voting patterns.Yes that's correct. The Alberta government bought the controlling share and they moved their head office to Calgary. It's not the only thing that made Calgary the hub though. They already had more international tourists due to geography, and it would have been the hub either way.
I see so many people on this thread pulling their hair out relating to things Edmonton should have done or complaining about Edmonton's attitude, etc, but IMO, this is something Edmonton never had control of.
That seems very defeatist to me, while I understand why people here may feel that way, you can be behind 3-0 and still come back. You only lose when or if you give up.I have read through all of the recent posts and wanted to weigh in on the discussion. I see a lot of the blame for YEG's decline relative to YYC being pointed at Westjet, and while they are partly to blame, it goes further than that. When I lived in Edmonton my dad was a regular flyer due to his work. I remember him complaining about having to use YYC as far back as the 80's and 90's before Westjet was around.
The day that air travel took off and Banff became a major air travel destination, Calgary cemented itself as Alberta's main hub. Westjet maybe partly to blame, but in reality it was more of them taking of advantage of the situation that had already unfolded. Long before Westjet, PWA was also using Calgary as its hub. If Westjet had never come along, AC in combination with other European carriers would have done the same thing. It would have been to a lesser degree than with Westjet, but YEG would most likely be in the same situation. YOW is also in the same position being near Montreal.
Regarding Danielle Smith. I hate the woman with every fiber of my being, but I don't have an issue with her helping drum up support for flights to Alberta. If Nenshi (who I will be voting for) were in power I imagine he would do the same thing. The chances of Etihad choosing YEG as a destination is pretty much nil and YYC was probably borderline. If you can at least get one into Alberta then why not?
Yes, I wonder how many times the AB govt has tipped the scales to favour Calgary over the decades with regards to air service to build and maintain an artificial hub there and other sometimes related things.I do think the AB govt plays a significant role in bringing investment to the province - ministers were actively involved to build YYC's film industry, for instance, and many examples. Having all those key govt ministers since 2018/19 from only one city certainly didnt help Edmonton's cause.
True, but we've been tipped in our favor just as many times.......both cities can't be all things to everything and everyone....let them have the aerospace business......Geez - I sound like Ian now!Yes, I wonder how many times the AB govt has tipped the scales to favour Calgary over the decades with regards to air service to build and maintain an artificial hub there and other sometimes related things.
There were some examples already cited here, but offhand I think there at probably a dozen or more. It is astonishing how much the scales have unfairly been tipped against us and partly explains the situation.
Actually, IMO Edmonton would have been a much better natural fit for aerospace production with all the metal and industrial manufacturing and engineering work already done here. I feel just another example of tipping the scales.True, but we've been tipped in our favor just as many times.......both cities can't be all things to everything and everyone....let them have the aerospace business......Geez - I sound like Ian now!
Yes, definitely NOT HEAD OFFICES!!! We seem to get the less lucrative stuff, that sounds good and can be hyped a lot but may or may not lead to much of anything.We're already the following: Health/Pharma Hub, AI Hub, Hydrogen Hub, Oil and Gas Hub - Not Head offices but Operations wise, Gov't center, Military Hub, Educational Hub....how much more do we need?




