J_gordo said:
Marigold wouldn’t be responsible for that, they would likely get city data or input and calculate the timing that way. Or it is worked into the software program they are running for the signals. Either way, the city has never fixed my complaints about timing on 111th street and it’s been 5 years and many many 311 calls to get them to acknowledge there’s nothing they can do
Click to expand...
I mean, they currently are. And they’re who changed it when I kept complaining to them about it. And they were the ones trying to defend the professional engineer that originally timed it as it was. And when I called 311 they directed me to marigold.

So it seems they’re currently responsible 🤷🏼‍♂️
 
Kosy123 said:
Good thing to note is that I think for the Canadian ones, it's CMA numbers, which means our numbers are a bit deflated since our metro area is massive.
Click to expand...
For sure, I appreciate when CityNerd goes beyond the US but it can be tough to account for absolutely everything when our jurisdictions are so variable. He also acknowledged that the Mexican cities were probably pretty under-counted
 
20260209_072212.jpg
 
Seamusmuldrew said:
For sure, I appreciate when CityNerd goes beyond the US but it can be tough to account for absolutely everything when our jurisdictions are so variable. He also acknowledged that the Mexican cities were probably pretty under-counted
Click to expand...
Oh it's not just CityNerd who does it, even local transit threads by Canadians get that misconception. Probably why the stats and the perception differ compared to actually visiting the city and experiencing transit here.
 
thommyjo said:
Email marigold. Some arrogant prick there gave me a lecture about how a professional has timed the lights…. Maybe a few dozen more emails will teach them not to gaslight and to actually look at the obvious problems.

They fixed 95ave after my 3rd email and 2nd video sent to my councillor proved their claims beyond false.
Click to expand...

Heard back from MIP, they gave me similar boilerplate (albeit their response was very cordial and respectful), but they did include:

"On 104 Ave, specifically, the timing is such to allow pedestrians time to cross the avenue safely. In the future, detection loops will be installed along this stretch, which will shorten some of the wait times."

Guessing detection loops are waiting on the final asphalt lift before they can be installed.
 
The recommendations for bypassing the lights would be taking 105 Street to go west on 107
Avenue or River Valley Road to meet up with 107 Avenue at Groat Road.
 
northlands said:
Heard back from MIP, they gave me similar boilerplate (albeit their response was very cordial and respectful), but they did include:

"On 104 Ave, specifically, the timing is such to allow pedestrians time to cross the avenue safely. In the future, detection loops will be installed along this stretch, which will shorten some of the wait times."

Guessing detection loops are waiting on the final asphalt lift before they can be installed.
Click to expand...
As well as the timing, their red lights for left turns on some of the streets is totally bizarre. There are no cars, few pedestrians and of course no trains, yet you still have to wait a long time to turn.
 
David A said:
As well as the timing, their red lights for left turns on some of the streets is totally bizarre. There are no cars, few pedestrians and of course no trains, yet you still have to wait a long time to turn.
Click to expand...
Exactly. We have 3+ years till the trains running. So how about they time it for the current state.

Everyone please email Marigold and cc your councillor. It can change things.
 
I think the big challenge could be the arrival of the trains. I’m not sure when they’ll be ready.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top