Propose it to the city as a building code amendment! That would be great ! Sometimes its just a matter of noone ever drafting it up - most of our codes only get amended after something disastrous happens and they're like "oh, guess we should make a rule against that" - I mean they already bulldozed like 5 city blocks just to MAKE the whole jackson monstrosity..

I mean, as much as I love core urban, even their designs admittedly aren't doing this kind of frontage.. They're usually grocery stores or hotel-types or restaurants, which is great and all, I guess their foray into jackson is them testing the waters for that.. the issue is how everything is trying to be self-contained parking so we get most of the interior of the podium being used for driving into it for parking and then a small amt for some boutique cafe and then the rest some massive lobby. The lobby imo should be hidden and the commercial part focused to keep that "buy along this street" vibe.

Then due to their lack of vision they'll be like "hmm people aren't walking along here, we don't know why.. we put hotels, we put residential units, we put a grocery store, what ELSE did they want..?"

Yeah we need our weird ma and pa shops - this is the whole reason people moved to the suburbs, the mall did this first - putting these out of business, now we're just bulldozing the very buildings they'd set up shop IN. There is also a relaxing psychological effect when you can walk 10 steps and feel like you are at another business, vs walking an entire city block past an inaccessible building - and that's what these buildings feel like, a complete inaccessible waste of commercial space - when am I ever going to be in those buildings? Never! At least for the building they built across the street from the Tivoli they understood this.

I am more pissed at city planning than any developers - they just see an opportunity - they aren't imagining an overall vision. I mean, granted it doesn't help with phones and amazon the options FOR small businesses has diminished significantly, but still, we gotta have SOMETHING..
 
Last edited:
I see no reason Darko won't be able to demolish these buildings. It seems this is likely his next project after the two on King Street complete as he's got nothing else ongoing in Hamilton. These buildings will likely be gone within 1 to 2 years.

He'll just do it, if he owns them; "permit" be damned (as others have noted it being part of his M.O.). Hopefully not, but I admit it's a fool's hope.

That stretch of King has always been unfortunate... first because of the parking lots and poor uses (like that used car lot at Caroline), and now because of the towers and lack of smaller retailers. It's sad that the city doesn't seem to care.
 
Propose it to the city as a building code amendment! That would be great ! Sometimes its just a matter of noone ever drafting it up - most of our codes only get amended after something disastrous happens and they're like "oh, guess we should make a rule against that" - I mean they already bulldozed like 5 city blocks just to MAKE the whole jackson monstrosity..
The city doesn't have building code, this would need to be amended into the zoning for this area. I strongly agree with Chris here, the City's zone for medium mixed use should have a provision about providing small scale retail frontage as a base, developers can then apply for variances where they want to include larger units or no units.
 
They haven't even filed their site plan application here yet, don't get too excited.
I thought they can only get a demolition permit if the site plan is submitted and approved?

Additionally. With no other obvious projects following the two on King St at Queen and Caroline, I wouldn't be surprised if they move quickly on this.
 
Vranich may move quickly but you don't need SPA to demolish, no. Council made changes to demolition rules lately following the collapse of the Gore Park buildings which is leading to a tonne of demolitions across the City which were previously prohibited.
 
Vranich may move quickly but you don't need SPA to demolish, no. Council made changes to demolition rules lately following the collapse of the Gore Park buildings which is leading to a tonne of demolitions across the City which were previously prohibited.
So they made it more difficult to demolish because developers were demolishing buildings that shouldn't be and sat as an empty lot for years to decades. Now they went back to the old way because they can't be bothered to enforce rules around... Checks notes... Making sure buildings are structurally sound.

Love that. Super great. Looking forward to more vacant lots in our near future for decades. Empty grass lots are a sign of a successful downtown I've heard.
 
I thought they can only get a demolition permit if the site plan is submitted and approved?

Additionally. With no other obvious projects following the two on King St at Queen and Caroline, I wouldn't be surprised if they move quickly on this.
They already have approval for 2 buildings at Queen and Market if I remember correctly.

Edit.. Here the link to the project information on this site.It's actually at Queen and Napier. https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...95m-31s-vrancor-development-neuf.33356/page-4
 
Last edited:
They already have approval for 2 buildings at Queen and Market if I remember correctly.

Edit.. Here the link to the project information on this site.It's actually at Queen and Napier. https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threa...95m-31s-vrancor-development-neuf.33356/page-4
Considering the current rental market and the hotel market, I'd put my money on a hotel project across from a multi-million dollar arena renovation happening before start of a rental tower right next to two new rental towers that will likely take 3-5 years to reach full occupancy themselves, both owned by Vrancor.
 
Considering the current rental market and the hotel market, I'd put my money on a hotel project across from a multi-million dollar arena renovation happening before start of a rental tower right next to two new rental towers that will likely take 3-5 years to reach full occupancy themselves, both owned by Vrancor.
When has Vrancor ever worried about occupancy.
 
When has Vrancor ever worried about occupancy.
Having spoken to those who know Darko personally or through business, he ultimately thinks of himself as a businessman first, a hotelier second, and a legacy builder lately third.

Building a memorable boutique hotel next to the arena achieves all three. In the Hamilton of yesteryear with nothing much going for it, I'd very much agree. But Vrancor purchased this property in the last 6 months, has showed a proposal, and is literally in the process of getting ready to demolish it with workers, fencing and equipment on site this morning and late yesterday.
 
Or as I just rode by and one could even say demolition has begun. They were locking it up as I took the pic. Do they work Saturdays. I doubt it.
This corner is going to look strange when it comes down RIP George Hamilton and The Regal.

George Ham.jpg
 

Back
Top