I may have shared this previously on this or another thread, but to @Northern Light's point about the viability of patio seating, I got an interesting anecdote from a U of T bigwig a little while ago: before the Landmark project, they ran a little test case on patio seating because they wanted...

when you spy a @kotsy pic in the wild (uncredited, no less...):

Not for nothing, but I also get a chuckle out of the notion of the city that has "ball hockey playing not permitted" signs on its streets and "no tobogganing" signs in its parks being cool with a tree walk.

Take the entire tree walk budget and put it to plantings, pavers, and seating.

If they're not done by May 28, 2028, Allied are royally hooped...

AKA gardening leave.

That's a very solid effective land price, even in today's market, if they get anything close to their density ask (which they will).

That's an insult to printers tbqh.

The real race: this project breaking ground vs. the Ontario Science Centre roof collapsing...

...that, and presumably it also means the City's de facto endorsement of having these dealers queue cars and car trailers in the f***ing bike lane all the time will be rendered moot. Also, ban Arcadis.

The lobby looks open and there is an A-frame standing outside, so I'm assuming they've started PDIs.

This might be the most self-aware thing a sports billionaire has ever done.

To me it's less a question of height and more one of massing/bulk; I just don't think that west side is very well resolved, and that's the one that really has (or Ideally should have) a dialogue with Convocation Hall and the little north-south road down to College. And maybe I'd feel a bit...

Not so sure about the scale of this here.

Also does this imply that they would be fine with legal deer hunting?