There’s something so unnecessary - or unspecial about this therme group attraction. It has no cultural value, and it doesn’t seem particularly interesting or fun. To use such an important location for this is a huge mistake and it feels like selling out.

This building is so nearly perfect. It’s a shame they cheapened out and didn’t do the horizontal brise soleils. The building’s vertically is kind of awkward, and the proportions between the base portion and the top are kind of weirdly balanced as a result of these being missing. I hate saying...

European style density is denser, smaller lot sizes, and skinnier streets There are good and bad examples of soviet buildings and soviet planning. If you look at Nowa Huta in Krakow, for instance, or other examples from Russia, they aren't so bad, but IMO not what we should be aiming for...

I guess I’ll wait to see more than just these 3 photos but it seems like this is the typical inhuman recent Canadian/Toronto urbanism. It’s like a weird, modern, faux happy go lucky equivalent of old Soviet architecture and planning. They should develop this more like the humber area...

Can you provide more details on this? They wanted to building a European style street grid but it was vetoed by the fire department?

A while back David Thomson was planning another museum for his collection on the "above ground art supply store" site next door as well. I wonder what happened to that.

will the backs of the buildings on the park (the old houses) have shops or anything or will they just be blank? Also, The backs of the privately owned houses facing the laneway part of the park would be a good place for Toronto to pilot laneway apartment buildings like you can do in places in...

Hey guys the tricon development isn't for the foundry site. You guys will like what they're up to though.

https://henriquezpartners.com/intent-post/wood-blocks-to-unit-types/ here they show the massing studies. Does anyone know if west bank owns the other properties on the corner? They’ve done some massing ideas for them too. .

Anyone who was able to attend the DRP meeting today have any details/photos from the presentation of this project?

Can anyone who was at the meeting fill us in?

Can anyone who was at the meeting fill us in? In this video, the architect starts talking about the building at around 9 minutes and 15 seconds. It doesn't sound like the developer was ever interested in an innovative design, and the original design was just a bait and switch.

In one of the planning documents they thank the designer Thomas Heatherwicks studio. Could he have been involved with some of the conceptual architectural ideas? He has worked with Bjarke Ingles in designing other google projects. "Sidewalk would like to acknowledge the contributions of Beyer...

Was anyone on here present at this DRP meeting and able to give us some details on the project?

Can we expect high quality architecture despite it not being designed by a "starchitect"?