In the Edmonton Journal article, it said: Does this mean the EDC actually does have some teeth? I would again say that I don't expect the worst, since Stopgap's owner must know it would be disastrous for Stopgap to build something really ugly. But if it looks bad, I'll be ready to speak out.

I'm surprised about materials. Is it really that expensive to haul them around by freight train?

I mean... I wouldn't be surprised.

Some of that graffiti has been up for a while! I see groups hanging around right at that spot most times I pass by. I'm surprised they don't have security there?

What makes the cost of construction higher? Is it mostly labor or materials/other capital?

According to the budget, they did spend $30M. I'll ask some of my colleagues in Bio Sci when I get a chance. (There's definitely been a lot of work going on in the past year there.)

From the drawing, it looks like the siding will be similar to a lot of the U of A residences along 87 and 88 Ave, which is pretty good.

Well, the new fraternity-associated building going up two doors down isn't bad. We'll see, I guess...

This should contribute to a wonderful little cluster of vintage/consignment stores around 124 St. I wish more would take a chance downtown though!

Two more days to take the survey for the Wihkwentowin renewal!

Just got mine today—can't wait to gain a few pounds in mid-March!

Progress on this lodging house (probably fraternity-associated)

Unfortunate, but I think prioritizing NAIT over this must be the right call.

Sadly I think this house has been demolished.

I had wondered based on the location, and the number of units checks out. I would find it a questionable choice to use this money for a luxury building, though, even if it isn't specifically targeted at affordability.