News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 
  1. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    I think you both have the wrong ideas, and you both have bee's in your bonnets.
  2. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    Can you send me your other post, thanks
  3. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    Again you are being extreme, as I said I don't disagree with changing the old plaza to a new design, you really have a bee in your bonnet.
  4. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    I'm not so sure - really what is your interest - are you for large storey developements, high density be honest.
  5. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    What is your interest in the 8 towers up to 40 storeys high, how does this affect you, are you involved in this project? Lets hear it.
  6. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    How about I live right across the street and it will shadow my property, where are the nearest 40 story towers around this area?
  7. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    I agree about the current use is outdated, BUT 40 storey towers are excessive,
  8. G

    Toronto Toronto | Lawrence Plaza Redevelopment | 130.9m | 40s | RioCan | Diamond Schmitt

    40 storey towers are excessive, Also only the highest buildings would be placed on the main roads i.e. Bathurst St and Lawrence Avenue. The other proposed buildings off Bathurst Street i.e. Covington are also excessively high by City of Toronto standards. In example review the building being...

Back
Top