News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.4K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 39K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 4.7K     0 

  1. H

    GTHA Transit Fare Integration

    Stupid question: does this one fare program apply to UPX?
  2. H

    Toronto Toronto | Crosstown LRT | ?m | ?s

    just not for revenue services...
  3. H

    GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

    I found out what they are doing here...
  4. H

    Finch West Line 6 LRT

    Did he mention what year?
  5. H

    GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

    Saw this site at Centennial Station today. Seems that they are digging into the ground. What's happening here?
  6. H

    Toronto Toronto | Crosstown LRT | ?m | ?s

    So where did we get the confidence Toronto won't let this rot as well?
  7. H

    Toronto Toronto | Crosstown LRT | ?m | ?s

    In 30 years it will be obsolete and scrapped like the SRT.
  8. H

    Toronto Toronto | Crosstown LRT | ?m | ?s

    Lest forget the idiots who drive onto the tracks, collide with trains and press the emergency stops for no/trivial reasons...
  9. H

    GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

    Any TOD planned for this area?
  10. H

    GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

    Some work is being done on the Stouffville Line at the level crossings at Unionville Main Street and McCowan. Workers are removing vegetation around these crossings. Any idea what is happening?
  11. H

    GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

    https://www.blogto.com/city/2023/11/pickering-union-station-toronto/
  12. H

    Markham Toronto | Markville Mall Redevelopment | 138m | 45s | Cadillac Fairview | Urban Strategies

    Yes, and the lawn sign groups are opposing the whole Secondary Plan, not just the CF project. So their number is not far off. I am not sure why the other post said it is.
  13. H

    Markham Toronto | Markville Mall Redevelopment | 138m | 45s | Cadillac Fairview | Urban Strategies

    The opposing parties said the City gave the 40 - 50K new resident number in the 2nd public meeting, after being specifically asked. Now that number is not correct? If yes what is the correct number and the source?

Back
Top