News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 6K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 30K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 2.9K     0 

  1. O

    Toronto | Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

    that is 89.4 of the unit release (677), not all the unit (864)
  2. O

    Toronto | Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

    Seems like sales are going well, what are the chances demolition starts before 2023????
  3. O

    Toronto | Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

    Does anyone know how sales are doing?
  4. O

    Toronto | Eight Cumberland | 170m | 51s | Great Gulf | a—A

    Most likely it's the same leadership, but cost of materials and labour have skyrocketed so they do what good leadership does to keep a project going.
  5. O

    Toronto | Time and Space Condos | 101.8m | 29s | Pemberton | Wallman Architects

    This building is turning out very well indeed. one of my favourites in the city. I don't understand the hate.
  6. O

    Toronto | Lawrence Allen Centre | ?m | 4s | RioCan | Pappas

    Definitely not a full field, the ad says 3 vs 3 so they will not have 11 v 11 on there. the pillar between the fields is just waiting to have someone to have a bad time with it
  7. O

    Toronto skyline

    Because I love stitching photos
  8. O

    Toronto | U of T: Schwartz Reisman Innovation Centre | ?m | 20s | U of T | Weiss/Manfredi

    Any word on when the 20 story building will start construction?
  9. O

    Toronto | Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

    With Canada soon to ban foreign ownership, you would think this project would feel a bit more urgency to start selling earlier than June to get the last bit of that foreign money.
  10. O

    Toronto | Waterworks Building Redevelopment | 47.55m | 13s | MOD Developments | Diamond Schmitt

    Wish they could update Toronto yearly with the pace of constructions here. but GE is still much better than Bing Maps which is 10 years out of date for Toronto
  11. O

    Toronto | Ontario Line (was Relief Line South, in Design) | ?m | ?s

    After months of delay (and therefore more cost) to change the architectural expression and some other people don't like the new expression, do we go back again for another architectural expression.......???? If you want timely and cost effective transit projects, ANY Public involvement is bad...
  12. O

    Toronto | Crosstown LRT | ?m | ?s

    You would have the problem of right turning cars on every intersection which you don't have to worry about with the current design. The current design has to contend with left turning cars but their are many more right turns possible than left.
  13. O

    Toronto | Ontario Line (was Relief Line South, in Design) | ?m | ?s

    that say only means more cost and delay however. for example one reason we seem to be only using TBMs is because it is "less disruptive" but if we used much reduce cost, which would have possible made it easier to go with a longer line to begin with with make the entire line underground...
  14. O

    Toronto | Ontario Line (was Relief Line South, in Design) | ?m | ?s

    Why should the public be involved in station design at all. it would only increase cost and delay to the project. The less public involvement in transit projects the better things are i.e. cheaper and faster construction. Look at the Montreal REM L'est for why you shouldn't get the public...

Top