Northern Light
Superstar
You can't.
The stations were not designed to accomodate them and retrofitting them would be prohibitively expensive.
This is true. two at each and every station would be in the billions, probably tens of billions, because you have to alter the track geometry, at several locations.
That said @81-717 is not wrong to think we can do better.
1) It is feasible (though not cheap) to isolate the power feed to the existing crossovers, so they aren't affected by a shutdown one or more stations away.
2) We can add additional cross-overs, just not dozens or such. Again, its expensive, as it would, in most cases, require removing a section of tunnel wall and placing a new beam in, for a distance of many meters, and you really want the tracks/tunnels on both sides to be straight, or quite close to straight to make it workable.
On the latter, I can live w/the number of crossovers on line 1, but I think Line 2 requires at least 3 more gross, 2 more net to be more resilient.
Adding locations in the east and west should be feasible; but adding one between Castlefrank and Bay (ideally Sherbourne) to avoid the problematic St. George to Broadview service gap looks very, very challenging. Curves and bridges galore. I'm not sure it is feasible at a price that would make any sense at all.
Last edited:




