News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.6K     0 

Hallway health care metric one of several 'to be retired' from health agency’s public report​


From https://www.torontotoday.ca/local/health/hallway-health-care-metric-one-of-several-to-be-retired-from-health-agencys-public-report-11839775

The metric was not included in the latest Ontario Health annual report, with one emergency physician calling it ‘utter malpractice’ to not release the data publicly

An average of 1,390 Ontario patients were treated each day in “unconventional spaces” — mainly stretchers in emergency department hallways — in early 2024, according to Ontario Health’s 2023-24 annual report.

This was slightly higher than the average of 1,326 patients the year prior, the agency stated in its 2022-23 annual report.

This figure, however, was not included in the agency’s latest annual report released last month, although several emergency doctors who spoke with The Trillium say hallway health care is a problem that physicians, nurses and patients continue to face on a regular basis.

In fact, the 2024-25 annual report from Ontario Health, the agency overseeing the province’s health-care system, says that the average number of patients being treated in "unconventional spaces" is one of several “measures to be retired” under an updated "Accountability Agreement" with the Ministry of Health.

"We track how the health system is performing using indicators set out in our Accountability Agreement (AA) with the Ministry of Health. This agreement, which is updated every three years, will be refreshed in 2025 to focus on what matters most to people in Ontario," the agency's report stated.

Ontario Health said that as part of its work to "track performance indicators," which helps keep its focus on improving care for Ontarians, the agency updated the indicators to "move beyond those focused on COVID-19 recovery and to remove those with reporting delays."

Other measures a footnote in the report stated would be "retired" include the percentage of hip and knee surgeries done within the recommended target wait times, adult cancer and non-cancer surgical volumes, the percentage of patients who visited an emergency department (ED) four or more times for mental health and addictions reasons, the proportion of virtual to in-person primary care visits, the number of patients accessing virtual care, the percentage of Ontarians with a virtual visit in the past year, the percentage of COVID-19 tests completed within two days and the percentage of cancer screening tests compared to pre-pandemic volumes.

Data for these measures were also not included in the 2024-25 annual report.

Asked whether it would still track these metrics, the government indicated that Ontario Health is still monitoring “no-bed admits,” mental health and addictions-related ED visits, cancer screening rates, surgeries done within the recommended wait times and more.

“The proportion of primary care visits that are virtual, proportion of Ontarians accessing virtual care, percentage of tests completed to pre-pandemic, and COVID test indicators are no longer tracked as they were solely to monitor care during the pandemic,” said Ema Popovic, spokesperson for Health Minister Sylvia Jones.

“To be clear, outside of the annual reporting process, Ontario Health tracks key performance indicators to help ensure the healthy system is delivering high-quality care, this includes measures that have been highlighted in the Annual Report, but also many others,” Popovic said.

She added that the measures included in Ontario Health’s annual report “are those relevant to assessing the agency's performance” and that 21 new performance indicators were added in the 2024-25 report for this purpose.

This includes colorectal, cervical and breast screening participation rates and the number of days of physician coverage provided to communities in need.

“I think that's complete and utter malpractice in terms of public accountability and transparency for our biggest line item in our province's budget,” said Dr. Raghu Venugopal, an emergency physician in Toronto, of the government not publicly sharing hallway health-care data.

“Why hide the data? What does it achieve? Because nurses, doctors, patients, families know it right? … It's our taxpayer money, we'd like to know how it's being spent, where can we spend better,” said Venugopal.

He said he hopes the Ford government decides to share the data publicly.

"The only reason you wouldn't share data is shame, and I don't think there's a need to be shameful, because this actually is not a political issue," he said. "It's not one person that did this, it's decades that did this, multiple administrations ... it's like an abscess, just say it's there and open it and deal with it."

He called the reality of hallway health care “brutal.”

"I am one of thousands of doctors who can tell you that what happens because of hallway medicine is an affront to human dignity, a patient safety issue and just terrible medicine," Venugopal said, adding that patients are having their undergarments changed or sensitive exams done in hospital hallways because of a lack of available beds.

Dr. Alan Drummond, an emergency physician in Perth, said he “wouldn't put it past this or any other government to try and hide key performance indicators that put them in a bad light,” if that is in fact the intent of any change.

“It doesn't matter whether they publish it or not. The reality of it is every emergency physician and every emergency nurse in this province knows that it's not good, it's not getting better anytime soon, and you can't hide from it,” said Drummond, who is also past chair of public affairs for the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians.

Drummond said physicians are routinely treating patients in hallways, chairs, closets and other spaces around hospitals.

“We’re frankly sick of it,” he said. “I saw somebody last year in a toilet. In a physical toilet, I examined a patient because I had no other space to see them.”

Drummond said doctors at his hospital often see patients in an ambulance bay that has a window “wide open to the entire world.”

“There's no pretext anymore of privacy, confidentiality or dignity — it's all gone. We're wiping people's asses in hallways,” he said.

Meanwhile, provincial opposition parties also slammed the government.

Dr. Adil Shamji, an emergency room doctor and the Liberals’ critic for primary care, urgent care and public health, said the hallway health-care metric is important to track because the measure affects the flow out of the emergency department and how long people are waiting to see an emergency doctor.

The data should also be public, he said, because seeing the number of people not receiving "timely, dignified care ... allows Ontarians to know what to expect and empowers them to demand better."

NDP health critic France Gélinas pointed to the 2018 promise from Ford's Progressive Conservatives to end hallway health care.

"Eight years in government later and they’ve decided hiding this data is easier than fixing the problems," she said in a statement. "The quality of service our hospitals deliver is directly related to how many patients are receiving care in the hallway. If we want to fix this problem we need to properly fund our hospitals."
 
In lead up to the Ford government's 2026 budget, Ontario hospitals have been sounding the alarm about rising costs and "deepening structural" deficits, warning that "tough choices" could be ahead and asking the province for more funding stability.

Venugopal said the ER-related statistics that are included in Ontario Health's latest annual report — emergency department length of stay for all visits and physician initial assessment (PIA) wait times — are also important metrics.

"The three metrics that matter are how fast we see them, how fast we get them out of the ER, and then when we don't succeed, what percentage of those are in unconventional spaces," he said.

At the end of 2024-25, 10 per cent of patients stayed a total of more than 11.8 hours in the ER, up from 11.7 hours the year prior.

"Performance was impacted by factors including seasonal respiratory illnesses and the acute care system operating consistently above 100% occupancy, which impeded patient movement out of the ED," the report stated, adding that "addressing ED wait times will be a focus for Ontario Health in 2025/26 with targeted interventions to support performance improvements."

The annual report also showed that 10 per cent of patients waited more than 4.6 hours to get assessed by a physician in March 2025, which Ontario Health said was a "major deviation against the year-end target of four hours." It was also slightly more than the 4.5 hours reported the previous year.

"Wait times to PIA (physician initial assessment) impacts ED care quality, safety and the patient experience," the agency stated.

Popovic, the health minister’s spokesperson, said that PIA times improved between April and November last year, from 4.4 hours to 4.1 hours. She added that in 2024-25, the total number of ED visits decreased by nearly 200,000 and non-urgent ED visits were reduced to less than 13 per cent.

She attributed this to the government’s “record investments” in health care — including $91.5 billion this year — and its moves to expand primary care and allow pharmacists to treat minor ailments.

“We have increased funding by 4% to the hospital sector for a record 3 years in a row while investing $44 million to tackle emergency department (ED) wait times and $10 million to upskill 1,000 nurses to work in emergency departments,” Popovic said.

Meanwhile, Shamji called the numbers in Ontario Health’s report "unacceptably high."

"What we're seeing in terms of the emergency department wait times, whether you look at it as length of stay or time to initial physician assessment, these are terrible outcomes that really paint the picture of emergency departments that are straining in ways that have never been seen before," he said.

The Trillium reported in 2024 on internal government data showing that one in 10 patients admitted to an Ontario hospital from an emergency department waited at least two days before getting a bed.

Additional reporting showed that in January 2024, an average of 1,860 patients per day were kept in unconventional spaces in hospitals across the province — the highest number till that point since 2017.

That was according to data The Trillium obtained through the freedom-of-information system, which also showed an average of 826 patients per day in unconventional spaces in June 2018 when the Progressive Conservative government came into power.

Ontario Health changed the definition of hallway health care in February 2020, to include patients held in unconventional spaces outside the emergency department, not just inside it.

Doug Ford’s PCs ran on a campaign in 2018 that promised to "cut hospital wait times and end hallway medicine."

During last year's provincial election campaign, the PCs’ platform didn’t explicitly echo the 2018 commitment, but included health-care promises such as connecting all Ontarians to a family doctor or primary care team by 2029, additional medical school seats and investments to boost health-care staff.

The provincial Liberals centred their 2025 campaign on health care, saying at one campaign stop that the province’s hallway health-care issue had turned into an “ER chair" crisis where patients are being treated in chairs because there aren’t enough beds or stretchers.
 

Hallway health care metric one of several 'to be retired' from health agency’s public report​


From https://www.torontotoday.ca/local/health/hallway-health-care-metric-one-of-several-to-be-retired-from-health-agencys-public-report-11839775

The metric was not included in the latest Ontario Health annual report, with one emergency physician calling it ‘utter malpractice’ to not release the data publicly
'If we don't talk about it - it doesn't exist'
 
A couple of very large announcements out of the province today. I'll give them each their own post so people can quote more easily.

First up, post-secondary funding, the province is more or less making Universities and colleges whole from past underfunding and the loss foreign students.


From the above:

1770921481680.png

1770921539975.png

1770921587281.png


Quick highlights: Funding gaps resolved, tuition to rise by 2% per year for the next 3 years, and by inflation or 2% whichever is less thereafter, and OSAP restructured to be 75% loan, minimum and 25% grant maximum.
 
The second announcement is advancing planning for what will be, if built, the world's largest nuclear power complex, surpassing Ontario's own Bruce Power Plant, wit capacity of 10,000 megawatts.

This would be sited at the former Wellesleyville Generation Station site just west of Port Hope, about 23km east of Darlington.


1770921898611.png

1770921937271.png


@old boy will be keenly interested in this....
 
He’s the best of the worst bunch of politicians. The other two major parties are much worse and would make this province even more bankrupt than it is was.
 
Perhaps for the right wingers who are upset of Doug Ford, maybe the pollsters should include the New Blue Party and the Ontario party then? There’s no PPC party of Ontario btw. And why do people still support Ford? Maybe they want cheap gas prices.
 
He’s the best of the worst bunch of politicians. The other two major parties are much worse and would make this province even more bankrupt than it is was.
I am always curious to know what it means by “bankrupt the province” as no government has ever caused or achieved that regardless of who was running it. Including this one.
 
Last edited:

Ford cancels plan to remove Crown Royal from LCBO shelves after $23M deal​

From https://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/ontario-doug-ford-crown-royal-lcbo/article_bbad24ff-d0a5-5cd2-a775-99f3459b56cd.html

Ontario Premier Doug Ford says Crown Royal will remain on liquor store shelves in the province after its parent company agreed to $23 million in spending in Ontario.

Premier Doug Ford says Crown Royal will remain on liquor store shelves in the province after its parent company agreed to $23 million in spending in Ontario.

Ford has been threatening for months to pull the product after Diageo announced it is closing a Windsor-area Crown Royal bottling plant.

In recent weeks, the premier has softened his tone, saying he offered what he called an olive branch to the company, urging them to support Ontario jobs in other ways since the Amherstburg closure will affect 200 jobs.

Ford announced today that Diageo has agreed to new spending in the province including $11 million to buy grain neutral spirits from eastern Ontario, $5 million in Ontario-based marketing and promotion, and $3 million in ready-to-drink beverages through a Toronto-based co-packer.

Diageo says in a statement that it is pleased Crown Royal will remain on Liquor Control Board of Ontario shelves and that the company remains committed to the province through its new investments.

Diageo also has bottling and distillation facilities in Manitoba and Quebec and government officials from those provinces expressed concern about what a boycott of Crown Royal in Ontario would do to those jobs.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 13, 2026.

The Canadian Press
 
I am always curious to know what it means by “bankrupt the province” as no government has ever caused or achieved that regardless of who was running it. Including this one.
Unlike Trudeau who had to deal with a hate campaign that was waged against him by the Conservatives. Doug Ford has no hate campaign waging against him as of 2026.
 
Unlike Trudeau who had to deal with a hate campaign that was waged against him by the Conservatives. Doug Ford has no hate campaign waging against him as of 2026.
I am not sure what you are meaning here…

…but I will say that being critical of government is not hate. Being critical of government in bad faith on the other hand….well let’s just say it’s problematic.
 
I am not sure what you are meaning here…

…but I will say that being critical of government is not hate. Being critical of government in bad faith on the other hand….well let’s just say it’s problematic.
Trudeau was literally followed for many months at public events by a crowd of F*** Trudeau types that would scream obscenities, etc at him and on at least one occasion, throw rocks at him.
 

Back
Top