News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 11K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 43K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 6.7K     0 
Seems like good analysis.

Trump got into this war without properly gaming it out. Iran (backed by Russia and China) are incentivized to make this foray painful for the US and their Gulf allies. Iran wants to establish deterrence from trying something similar in the future, and Russia/China like to see the US distracted and expending munitions stockpiles, as well as alienating Gulf allies (who are furious).
 
Trump got into this war without properly gaming it out.
US thought they could do to Khamenei what they did to Maduro: remove him from the equation. They thought Iran would rally around the show of strength of the assassination and the country would collapse. They didn't calculate that they'd be making him a martyr or that he was actively holding back the IRGC. Combine that with Iran being a stronger military power than they anticipated, with or without help from Russia/China, and they're now stuck in a forever war with a country that doesn't want to stop. But hey, at least now Trump can invoke emergency clauses to begin drilling for oil off of California.
 
Seems like good analysis.

A couple of things that didn't quite pass the smell test for me with this interview:

1. The guest. I am not very familiar with John Mearsheimer. But the dude said this during the interview starting at 36:03 into the video, and I quote:
Putin is a first-rate strategic thinker. I don't know how anybody could disagree with that. The idea that he's some sort of fool who's detached from reality: makes no sense... I think he has a powerful strategic mind.
I don't know what you have to be smoking to say that. One just has to look at how Putin has handled the invasion of Ukraine. And anyone who goes onto podcasts and in the middle of the interview starts injecting praises to Putin, gaslighting the audience into thinking Putin is great, when literally no one asked, that speaker makes me suspicious about everything else they say.

2. The channel. The most recent video on the channel is with Scott Ritter. Scott Ritter is a regular guest on the channel. Scott Ritter is a convicted pedofile who is documented to be on Kremlin's payroll. He's been shilling for Putin for years now. A regular "military analyst" on RT and Sputnik. He pretends to be a military analyst while his only real accolade is being a sad low rank army washout that hasn't served in over 30 years.

So given all that, I would take anything I hear from this YouTube channel with a large pinch of salt.
 
I see speculation is that Trump plans to seize the oil loading facility on Kharg Island, which is the main export terminal for Iran. US holds it indefinitely as strategic leverage, perhaps to extract their vig similar to Venezuela. They can also make it a US military base, though I'm not sure why that would be desirable.

This is very much a double edged sword. It starves the regime of critical revenue. But oil prices would skyrocket to $150 overnight. And that might prompt China to actively start supplying Iran.
There's real signs here that they absolutely ignored military advice. There's been rumours out that they launched this against the advice of Gen. Cain (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff). And it's apparent. No half-competent military profess would underestimate the air and naval threat in the Gulf.

Seems like good analysis.

Trump got into this war without properly gaming it out. Iran (backed by Russia and China) are incentivized to make this foray painful for the US and their Gulf allies. Iran wants to establish deterrence from trying something similar in the future, and Russia/China like to see the US distracted and expending munitions stockpiles, as well as alienating Gulf allies (who are furious).

I am not very familiar with John Mearsheimer.

Mearsheimer has become a Putinist over the last few years. That said, the general conclusion that this war is lost is probably trending towards accurate. Regime change through air power only happened in Serbia. And that's a lot smaller than Iran.
 
Last edited:
It's not even been two weeks since the start of the war, and the narratives shaping the discussion have reached a fever pitch on all sides. From the doom and gloom of "Iran has already won", to the somehow very popular (and laughable) narratives that Tel-Aviv has been leveled to the ground about 20 times over by now, to Trump saying that he has won.

Let's try to cut through the noise. As with anything, there's something to every side of the argument.

Positive Results
The military strikes against Iran have greatly diminished its capacity to retaliate. Ballistic missile launch capacity is down to 10% of what it was on day 1, significant reduction of drone launch capacity over the last couple of days:

1773321847947.png

source

1773321951484.png

source


The Bad
IRGC's strategy of setting the world economy on fire is working. Faced with the existential threat, they are lashing out the only way they can: mining the straight of Hormuz, missile, drone, USV strikes on the maritime traffic. Multiple ships are being hit daily. Here's just the latest batch of oil tankers set ablaze:

Worst of all, they're not just stopping the traffic, they are trying to destroy the entire oil shipping infrastructure of the region. In their latest move yesterday, they struck the oil terminal in Salalah, Oman. This is a port city outside of the Persian Gulf that oil tankers were being loaded without having to go through the Straight of Hormuz. Other gulf countries have pipelines running to Salalah which they were using to offload their oil to bypass the Hormuz blockade. Following the strike on Salalah, the port is out of commission for now.

So if the Islamic Republic's war aims are to sow maximum chaos and upend world's energy trade, they are winning on that front, even if their missile/drone launch capacity is down to 5-10% right now.

The Ugly
Trump got into this war without properly gaming it out.
Yep. Just like everything else with this completely incompetent admin. It doesn't seem like they considered anything after the initial strikes and Khamenei assassination.

they're now stuck in a forever war with a country that doesn't want to stop
It's not a "forever war" per se, but the genie is out of the bottle. To stop now is almost even worse than to keep going. Now that you have Khamenei Jr. in charge, how do you stop? You have someone in charge of Iran who's been an even more radical hardliner than his father before the war. And now you've killed his father, his mother, his wife, and his son. You're going to leave him in charge of a country who was the biggest state sponsor of terrorism even before he came to power?

If the US suddenly ends the war now, here are some of the probable events to look forward to in the future:
1. Assassination attempts on Trump and Netanyahu by the Islamic Republic. Personal revenge for what they've done to Khamenei Jr. We saw less than 2 years ago that a determined dude with a good ol' sniper rifle can come to within an inch of taking out Trump. If the secret service can't even deal with that, how will they deal with a hypothetical explosive FVP drone on a fiber-optic tether that can fly past any jammers?
2. The usual IRGC "Death to America" chant becomes something more than an empty threat. They could plan something bigger than 9/11 ever was. They don't have a nuke, but they have 440 kg of highly enriched uranium. What if they smuggle some of that into USA? And what if they then set off hypothetical dirty bombs around Manhattan to cover the whole place in radioactive dust?

Now, Trump admin didn't have the wherewithal to think of the potential outcomes of starting the war. I have very little confidence that they will think of any consequences of stopping the war now either.

They've kicked the hornets nest. They have to deal with it now. And I have zero confidence that they will, in fact, deal with it.
 
Last edited:
Worries about food and water security are much higher than oil infrastructure getting hit. Most of their food is imported. And most of their water is desalinated.
Yes, there are certainly those concerns as well.
As far as food insecurity, the logistical chains can be readjusted not to go through Persian Gulf, but instead to go by ground from other ports on the Arabian peninsula.
Desalination plants are certainly a vulnerability too. For example, 80% of Riyadh water supply comes from a single desalination plant. Imagine Iran takes it out... On the other hand, desalination plants are less vulnerable than oil infrastructure. Shahed drones have a 90-120kg warhead. You detonate that over an oil reservoir, the whole place burns down to a crisp. You detonate that over a desalination plant? Okay, you'll take out a piece of equipment. That can be repaired/replaced a lot easier than having to rebuild an entire oil refinery from scratch.
 
China probably wants this over sooner rather than later to contain oil prices, but they will see value in depleting US capabilities and drawing resources away from Asia.

Iran and especially Russia are incentivized to keep this going as long as possible. Iran to establish sufficient deterrence from ever trying something like this again, and Russia has been given a massive lifeline in terms of lifting oil sanctions. Europe will probably be leaning on Ukraine not to harass Russia oil export infrastructure in the near term.
 
China is still receiving its oil shipments from Iran.

They are probably happy to do what they usually do. Sit back and watch the Americans make fools of themselves and lose another war
 
I think you've lost the plot with this. Do you have any idea the kinds of things Russia has been up to? I can only hope this comes from a place of ignorance.
Israel just exonerated 5 IDF members for raping a Palestinian prisoner.

But I'm the one that's lost the plot obviously
 
Do you have any idea the kinds of things Russia has been up to? I can only hope this comes from a place of ignorance.
One can only hope that it's because all of the war crimes Russia has been up to don't make it into the information bubble of the "I support the current thing" crowd. And not because they actually look at what Russia is doing and say "meh, Israel is SO MUCH worse!". Because that would be insane.

Israel just exonerated 5 IDF members for raping a Palestinian prisoner.
But I'm the one that's lost the plot obviously
Here, take a look at this one. (Trigger warning for others, the video features Russian soldiers going door to door, executing all adult civilians in an entire village. One little girl is captured. Her parents are executed in the garden of their home and hidden from little girl's sight as the she is kidnapped to mainland Russia).

And that's just one story that struck a chord with me. If you ever bothered to look at what's going on Ukraine, you'd know that these things happen there almost daily. And unlike the IDF soldiers that were acquitted of the rape, none of the Russian war criminals go through the court system. A lot of them get medals of honor for this. The worse the war crime, the higher the honor.

But yeah, IDF is the biggest evil in this world my ass... It's only the biggest evil in certain echo chambers that are completely devoid of reality.
 
But yeah, IDF is the biggest evil in this world my ass... It's only the biggest evil in certain echo chambers that are completely devoid of reality.
You are guilty of what you are accusing me of. Just from a pro Israeli perspective.

I actually took afransen's criticism to heart and took a deeper dive into Russia's war crimes in Ukraine. And the one thing I noticed is that it was very similar to the Israeli playbook.

And your defense of Israel is pathetic as they repeat what they did in Gaza in Lebanon now.

I will never understand people that support both Ukraine and Israel. Israel is similar to Russia in their actions.
 

Back
Top