Since the Eglinton-Allen intersection will be headed to IEC next Tuesday (IE28.2), I wrote a recap of the March 23 virtual meeting which over 250 people attended to explain where things stand (including the eglintonTOday project which is of interest to those who bike). Please send your comments to
iec@toronto.ca this week to keep the pressure on council regarding eglintonTOday.
A blog about cycling and political advocacy based in Toronto, Canada. (#BikeTO)
www.twowheeledpolitics.ca
Thanks for the update, boo to the continued lack of commitment as to when they are going to put in these lanes. When the weather gets warmer is both an obvious statement and one that contains no actual information. I've been emailing the councillors, mayor and EglintonTOday asking about these plans every few month and have continued to get nothing firm – if I get a reply at all.
It also seems that through the city has decided to postpone the Bathurst-Allen section until they "solve" the traffic issues here, which will likely be never. I don't know how an approved plan can simply be altered post-hoc like that, but it seems to happen in Toronto fairly frequently. I don't recall if there was a vote in council to amend the EgTOday plans, or whether staff have the leeway to do things like this when something comes up – like in this case, people complaining.
Given that gap though, I'm curious as to what the city's plan is to make this a safe and connected bike route. You really can't (in any rational planning sense) make a bike route that ends, spits you into 5 lanes of fast moving traffic for 1 km, then starts again. So what's the plan, city folks? Detour cyclists up to the Beltline? It adds a mile and is pretty impassable in winter. They also killed (sorry, paused) the Marlee connection, which would make this more feasible. You still have to get across the Allen somehow.
It strikes me that here would have been a good spot to create a bidirectional bike lane on the south side of Eglinton around the Allen, thereby not interfering with cars' god-given right to enter and exit the highway. This would require westbound cyclists to make two crossings of Eglinton, which would suck, but it's better than not having anything. They do this kind of thing a lot on the MUP stretches further west on Eg.