kcantor
Senior Member
Here we are again stuck in the middle.
A reminder in addition that Working Families Edmonton, supported by local labour unions, likely spent several hundred thousand dollars in support of Knack and other candidates.I'm looking forward to part II of this article related to big money and dark money in the last municipal election.
Candidates who raised and spent the most had terrible results - most significantly Tim Cartmell who between himself and Better Edmonton had $1.48 million versus Knack at $240,000.
Cartmell's Better Edmonton, despite all it's money, actually ran a deficit of $38,000.
![]()
Keith Gerein: Big money led to big disappointment in Edmonton's city council election
We all know that wealth doesn’t guarantee wins, but usually there is a reasonably strong correlation. Except that didn’t happen last fall, when the campaign that spent by far the most was defeated by ...ca.news.yahoo.com
They are registered as third-party advertisers and did support Knack (non-financially), but it wasn't "several hundred thousand dollars". It was likely in the range of $1,500.A reminder in addition that Working Families Edmonton, supported by local labour unions, likely spent several hundred thousand dollars in support of Knack and other candidates.
THE HORROR!!!!A reminder in addition that Working Families Edmonton, supported by local labour unions, likely spent several hundred thousand dollars in support of Knack and other candidates.




