micheal_can
Senior Member
I meant the passenger level, not the delays or cancellations.Barring avalanches, winter should never be an excuse for delayed or canceled passenger rail service. It’s Canada, it snows.
I meant the passenger level, not the delays or cancellations.Barring avalanches, winter should never be an excuse for delayed or canceled passenger rail service. It’s Canada, it snows.
I don’t see Americans having a problem with street running on their townsFor so many reasons, no.
Show me a new line that would see several regular trains a day that are commuter and intercity trains.I don’t see Americans having a problem with street running on their towns
I don’t see Americans having a problem with street running on their towns
The blog article just titled the data as "2025", but certainly, winter ridership would be lower.It is winter. That makes sense.
Street running railways are legacy routes largely to service industrial customers (are there any left in Canada?). I suspect many predate the road that they are now on. In addition to local opposition, I suspect the CTA would never approve a heavy rail corridor comingled with a public road.I don’t see Americans having a problem with street running on their towns
While that's a pleasant thought, physics (and experience) says that you are very, very wrong on this.Barring avalanches, winter should never be an excuse for delayed or canceled passenger rail service. It’s Canada, it snows.
Might as well have ONR take over the freights too as we can't allow filthy Toronto elites run 451/450 anymoreIf Northlander is successful it could be the beginning of intercity rail in Ontario. It would make sense to eventually extend service to Sudbury.
As @JasonParis stated earlier, the success of Northlander could lead to a possible "Southlander" travelling to places like London, Sarnia, Windsor. Allow VIA to focus solely on the Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa triangle.
Union Station could become a transfer point between Northlander and Southlander trains.
EDIT: Perhaps if we can successfully negotiate with CN, we could even run an "Eastlander" service along the CN corridor between Toronto & Cornwall. Wishful thinking, I know.
One thing that jumped out at me in your blog was the number of passengers impacted by the White River-Sudbury cancellation. Forty-four cancellations impacted 326 passengers; meaning an average impacted ridership of roughly 7.5 passengers per train. Telling.
northerntracks.blog
While agree it would be nice, I don't think there is anything in the tea leaves that indicates the government is willing to expand VIA service. While seasonal highway closures are an issue, I expect the federal government would say that is a provincial problem to solve. Closures have an oversized impact on commercial traffic which, obviously, a passenger train cannot solve.Total ridership (on/off) for the year was 6,964. Source: VIA Rail
![]()
Sudbury-White River Train
Train Information+ Corridor: Sudbury to White River Frequency: Three times a week in each direction (Year Round) Service Provider: VIA Rail Schedule: Westbound | Eastbound Ridership Data+ Detailed …northerntracks.blog
I still believe this train needs to be extended West to Thunder Bay. There is more of a market to generate year round ridership with the addition of Marathon, Terrace Bay, Schreiber, Nipigon, Shuniah, a few First Nation communities, and last, but certainly not least, Thunder Bay.
I know there are hurdles (many) that need to be overcome for this to happen.
Transport Canada/VIA/Parliament doesn't consider West of White River "remote". However, the argument that the TransCanada highway (which runs parallel to the CPKC mainline) falls apart when it is repeatedly closed due to accidents and weather conditions. No detours available in certain areas, and cell service is absent during chunks of the drive.
There are similar as the issues cited in the UIBC for the Northlander which can be made to justify the extension. There's the added caviat that the country is litterally split in two when highways 11/17 are closed between Nipigon and Thunder Bay.
White River is the only end-point train station in VIA's network that is closed to the public, and one of only three that is unstaffed (Sarnia and Niagara Falls being the other two), again, according to VIA's website. I hold the opinion that this isn't an appropriate place to terminate a passenger train, when there are larger communities further up the line.
If we are going to restore it to Thunder Bay, Why not go to Winnipeg and cover all the major communities along 17 in NWO?While agree it would be nice, I don't think there is anything in the tea leaves that indicates the government is willing to expand VIA service. While seasonal highway closures are an issue, I expect the federal government would say that is a provincial problem to solve. Closures have an oversized impact on commercial traffic which, obviously, a passenger train cannot solve.
In my experience, communities from Marathon west tend to have Thunder Bay as their 'city anchor' (White River and south go to The Soo). While there might be some ridership between TBay and the northshore communities, I'm not sure there is a viable ridership of people from that area to Sudbury, let alone endure the roughly 16 hours it would take to get there.
Wouldn't read too much into it. Here in Pembroke, I've seen a GO transit car (can't remember if I've seen a bus), OC transpo busses, and an unmarked one that, judging by the colours, I guessed was going to North Bay. These things randomly happen once in a while.Anyone know why a GO bus would be transiting Highway 69? Is Ontario Northland short of buses?
Was it a new one? Could be getting delivered from the factory in Winnipeg.Anyone know why a GO bus would be transiting Highway 69? Is Ontario Northland short of buses?
I don't know. My wife was driving home and she mentioned it to me.Was it a new one? Could be getting delivered from the factory in Winnipeg.




