Voltz
Senior Member
It would be a blastThey could do like Queen Juliana airport on Sint Maarten and build a beach at the end of the runway, at a bar, and turn it into a tourist attraction.
It would be a blastThey could do like Queen Juliana airport on Sint Maarten and build a beach at the end of the runway, at a bar, and turn it into a tourist attraction.
Literally!It would be a blast
Once the province has the green light from Ottawa there’s nothing to stop the YTO runway being expanded to 6,000 ft plus overruns.The overrun is the bigger issue. You can put some of that special concrete at either end, but that adds more length required. Having the harbour or Lake Ontario right off the end of the runways is not ideal.
I think any airport runway extension should be contingent on the creation of a North-South pedestrian link from the terminal to Hanlan's Point, which would probably take the form of a set of pathways and bridges hugging the east side of the airport.They could do like Queen Juliana airport on Sint Maarten and build a beach at the end of the runway, at a bar, and turn it into a tourist attraction.
If we go down that path we should also be holding out for a proper and sheltered pedestrian link up to Queens Quay.I think any airport runway extension should be contingent on the creation of a North-South pedestrian link from the terminal to Hanlan's Point, which would probably take the form of a set of pathways and bridges hugging the east side of the airport.
I get that some waterfront residents don't want more traffic at the airport, but IMO this is an opportunity for the city to extract something from the airport, rather than getting shut out completely.
I was being factitious it's correctly Princess Juliana Airport). If you have ever been there, right off the end of the runway is a road then a beach. The runway is only 7500' and regularly sees large, widebody aircraft. They have to spool up right at the threshold and the tourists stand in the blast of jet exhaust and sand. It's a fairly dramatic takeoff since there is a small mountain just off the other end.I think any airport runway extension should be contingent on the creation of a North-South pedestrian link from the terminal to Hanlan's Point, which would probably take the form of a set of pathways and bridges hugging the east side of the airport.
I get that some waterfront residents don't want more traffic at the airport, but IMO this is an opportunity for the city to extract something from the airport, rather than getting shut out completely.
If we don't extend the runway, what aircraft would operate from Billy Bishop in 2040? By then, even the youngest Q400s will be over 20 years old, and wishful thinking aside, I don't see DHC restarting production. Porter and AC will have to either buy the ATR or cease operations at YTO.
Key West, Florida has a 5,076 ft runway and allows A319 and 737s if lightly loaded. I assume that’s the end goal, even if we start off with Porter’s smaller Embraer E195s and AC’s CRJ200s. Do we have any renderings of YTZ at 5,500 to 6,000 ft or more?The current question is not to extend the runway or not, it is 100% happening. The question is, by how much.
I don't see them being allowed to land on A319s and 737s no matter how loaded, with the current runway extension of 5,148 ft. I doubt they'd meet the sound requirements either.Key West, Florida has a 5,076 ft runway and allows A319 and 737s if lightly loaded. I assume that’s the end goal, even if we start off with Porter’s smaller Embraer E195s and AC’s CRJ200s. Do we have any renderings of YT0 at 5,500 to 6,000 ft or more?
If it is cheaper, the millions of people in the West GTA, Niagara, KW/Guelph, etc area could use that airport instead of BB to provide relief to Pearson passenger volumes.
If you mean YTZ (YTO is apparently the code "for multiple airports in the area, including those without passenger service") --... Do we have any renderings of YT0 at 5,500 to 6,000 ft or more?
That’s longer than Key West’s 5,076 ft, where both types operate.I don't see them being allowed to land on A319s and 737s no matter how loaded, with the current runway extension of 5,148 ft.
I assume those rules can be as easily erased by Queens Park’s overrunning the current YTO agreement against jets.I doubt they'd meet the sound requirements either.




