News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

  1. D

    VIA Rail

    If they are concerned, the unions should ensure a successorship right clause in the next contract round. They only had since the HFT concept started being bounced around to do so.
  2. D

    VIA Rail

    I wouldn't expect investor announcements until after regulatory approval.
  3. D

    VIA Rail

    The procurement timeline going forward looks pretty typical to me. Remember that the options here weren't speedy construction with a $10 billion budget authorization up front where money can buy stakeholder consensus versus the current process. It was status quo versus the current process.
  4. D

    VIA Rail

    Unifor doesn’t like P3s. That isn’t news, nor a surprise.
  5. D

    VIA Rail

    No. Very different roles.
  6. D

    General railway discussions

    Over the mountains in the west, and along the valleys into Vancouver, the capital costs will be so large that the government will have to play a role. At some point the quick wins from de-bottlenecking will be done and major projects will be needed instead. There aren't abandoned corridors that...
  7. D

    London Rapid Transit (In-Design)

    It is sad that there is so much off street parking on the Richmond corridor, but as always local businesses will think that if someone can't park right in front, that they'll suffer greatly. The off-street is fragmented, poorly allocated, and hard to navigate—but it isn't lacking.
  8. D

    London Rapid Transit (In-Design)

    To follow on, I present my London Ontario LRT real estate focusing line, because London doesn't have the density to support a polycentric network, so the best is to try to create a linear one. While hopefully making downtown a useful place to build density, to feed the polycentric destinations...
  9. D

    London Rapid Transit (In-Design)

    So, this is a huge debate in transit circles, but it really shouldn't be. It is the same as whether the Canada Line should have been built with provisions for 80m trains, or the entire Canada Line + Legacy Lines built with provisions for 120m trains. But it is pretty easy to show it is wrong...
  10. D

    London Rapid Transit (In-Design)

    Unfortunately they are in the mid-sized city trap, where what they can afford, even with 70% from elsewhere, doesn't improve trip times or service levels much (the old plan), because they don't have the resources available to clear bottlenecks, or provide adequate ROW protection. Better bus...
  11. D

    Toronto Toronto | Rogers Centre Renovations | ?m | ?s | Toronto Blue Jays | Populous

    It depends. Own can be quite colloquial. Likely somewhere in the 50-99 year lease range. There is a reason the stadium itself sold for so little, there are so many legal encumbrances (long term deals at low to no revenue) stretching back all the way to the initial financing. Given the long...
  12. D

    Toronto Toronto | Rogers Centre Renovations | ?m | ?s | Toronto Blue Jays | Populous

    They did a great job at Nationals Park. Visited it a week after went to a game at Wrigley, and somehow the stadium is much much larger, and yet felt nearly as intimate, and not a retro park.
  13. D

    Richmond Hill Toronto | Yonge Line 1 North Subway Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

    Yonge has two lanes of setback the most of the length of the extension by a quick review on Google Earth. Could easily cut and cover the entire thing with minimal disruption. Whether that would save money, probably all the savings would be in the changes to station boxes which would be driven by...
  14. D

    Richmond Hill Toronto | Yonge Line 1 North Subway Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

    For that money, they could expropriate all those houses, plus build the station. Then resell the houses.
  15. D

    General railway discussions

    And aren’t local routes majority state funded anyways? I’d guess in LA the risk of the state government coming in with an operational subsidy is minimal.
  16. D

    Richmond Hill Toronto | Yonge Line 1 North Subway Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

    Going deeper means deeper ventilation shafts. Stronger fans. It is pretty easy at this stage to just dismiss it as a zero cost move. But considering the total budget it is hard to dismiss this as nothing.
  17. D

    Richmond Hill Toronto | Yonge Line 1 North Subway Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

    Below grade in the metrolinx document isn’t contemplating tbm depth. And yeah if you go to expropriate an easement for tbm tunnelling I bet you’re looking at a symbolic amount - like $5000 a house. There isn’t any market value for 30m down. It isn’t like running a natural gas line in your side...
  18. D

    Richmond Hill Toronto | Yonge Line 1 North Subway Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

    ^ You don’t need to expropriate homes to go underneath.
  19. D

    Richmond Hill Toronto | Yonge Line 1 North Subway Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

    ^ as the hub and transfer station - a station designed to move lots of people - having it at ground level saves even more money than relocating an average station. Not that any of the line should be underground imo.
  20. D

    Toronto Toronto | Eglinton Line 5 Crosstown West Extension | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx

    Every addition like this is not a huge cost increase. But they all add up, in capital and operating costs. Can kiss the ability to have an unmanned station goodbye as well.

Back
Top