News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 02, 2020
 8.9K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 40K     0 
News   GLOBAL  |  Apr 01, 2020
 5.1K     0 

  1. C

    Toronto Toronto | Nobu Residences Toronto | 156.66m | 45s | Madison Group | Teeple Architects

    Lmao is that brown construction paper behind glass?
  2. C

    Toronto Toronto | Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

    Those swatches really do all read like they could be titled "Bleak Toronto Sky on a Depressing Winter Day #1–6". Hopefully it turns out well in execution.
  3. C

    Toronto Toronto | Ontario Line: Riverside-Leslieville Station | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | HDR

    This is reminiscent of the neighbourhood furor around the Davenport Diamond. Are there downsides to the people living nearby during construction and afterwards? Definitely yes. Would the tunnelling option they propose be wildly more expensive and also disruptive? Also yes. We cannot afford the...
  4. C

    Toronto Toronto | Peter and Adelaide | 152.39m | 47s | Graywood | BBB

    I feel like the people in control of a development company should have to write their names into the concrete of every building they build just so everyone knows who is responsible.
  5. C

    Toronto Toronto | Forma | 308m | 84s | Great Gulf | Gehry Partners

    I went back through the thread and maybe I missed it, but why is this called Forma? Does it mean something or is it just a random made up word? It doesn't seem to fit at all to me and sounds super generic.
  6. C

    Toronto Toronto | The Diamond | 101.14m | 36s | Neudorfer | Gabriel Bodor

    So why is this able to go straight up from the street, whereas the City seems to insist on or at least strongly push podium and setback topology almost everywhere else? (Not complaining, I like it.)
  7. C

    Toronto Toronto | Ontario Place | ?m | ?s | Infrastructure ON

    Definitely development has to destroy ecosystems to happen that's just how it is, and I'm not trying to say that I'm even against development at Ontario Place. But there's a difference between context-sensitive development that could happen here (that could maintain or foster natural ecosystem...
  8. C

    Toronto Toronto | 340 Wallace | 10.74m | 3s | Arcadia Custom Homes | Contempostudio

    This is already under construction and significantly far along if it's the same place I'm remembering. I'll try to take a photo next time I walk by.
  9. C

    Toronto Toronto | Ontario Place | ?m | ?s | Infrastructure ON

    The selling off of Ontario Place and bulldozing a current ecosystem to put in a glassed over tropical vacation spa is truly offensive and gross and absurd. The Ford gov (and supporters) should be made publicly to defend this ridiculous decision that will make our city worse and go against the...
  10. C

    Toronto Toronto | LNX Residences at Bloor and Dundas | 87.5m | 27s | Lormel Homes | Richmond Architects

    Yeah the panels on this look like they're made out of particle board or something. They look cheap and kinda rough now and I'm scared of how they're going to age.
  11. C

    Toronto Toronto | 160 Front West | 239.87m | 46s | Cadillac Fairview | AS + GG

    The execution on this building is full of surprises. Can't wait but slightly nervous to see what they do with the docking bays/freaky mouths lol
  12. C

    Toronto Toronto | 464 Queen West Parkette | ?m | ?s | City of Toronto

    Yes — it is more difficult for non-white and in particular Black artists' shows to get booked at venues. In Toronto and elsewhere. It is a historic cultural trend and is a thing still today and is an unfortunate dynamic. Based on either conscious or subconscious racist trepidation on the kind of...
  13. C

    Toronto Toronto | 464 Queen West Parkette | ?m | ?s | City of Toronto

    This should just be a permanent music space. They are endangered in this city. Many have closed and it's hard to start new ones with neighbourhoods not liking noise, zoning, and absurdly-high-rent being barriers. We are in need of them far more than parks at this point. Which isn't to say parks...
  14. C

    78 Gladstone Ave (@ Alma Ave, 3s, ?)

    Looks like this building maybe used to have a storefront? Would be good to bring that back.
  15. C

    Vaughan Toronto | RioCan Colossus Centre Redevelopment | ?m | 55s | RioCan | Hariri Pontarini

    Colossus without the Colossus? If they wanna keep the name they should keep the UFO!!
  16. C

    Toronto Toronto | Grain Lofts | 37.19m | 10s | Gairloch | Gabriel Fain Architects

    Really appreciate the switch to warm coloured materials. The design of the building is great, but the previous version was very imposing and monolithic.
  17. C

    Toronto Toronto | 115 Dupont | 22.33m | 5s | Zinc Developments | Cumulus

    I love this new version, but it will very much come down to the cladding. I hope it has good texture like in the render above and doesn't get downgraded to cheap panels.
  18. C

    Toronto Toronto | The Webley | 35.73m | 9s | Zinc Developments | Cumulus

    I like this one! Contrary to what the other poster said about it being just a "same old square building", sometimes simple geometry is best. I'd rather this next to me than something that tries to do some "break up the massing" and "stepping back" stuff and then have it end up just looking...
  19. C

    60 Paton Road (Nitta, ?s, ?)

    Rare case where the neighbourhood will maybe be supportive even if the ask is significant here lol. I live in the area too and the smell is quite noticeable at times (though it's weird, it doesn't exactly smell... that bad? but when you know what it is it makes it worse). I eat meat and...
  20. C

    Toronto Toronto | 49-51 Yonge Street | 226.86m | 62s | SmartCentres | a—A

    I'm curious what's going on in that lower right corner door in the last render above — the northmost corner on the Yonge side. It seems like they are removing part of the facade to reveal something underneath? At least it appears so from the worn way it is depicted in the drawing. Is this...

Back
Top